A Marxist Study of Space and Social Inequality in Dugo sa Bukang Liwayway
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19654083Keywords:
Wealth, Power, Social Inequality, Marxist Theory, SpatialAbstract
This study analyzed Dugo sa Bukang-Liwayway by Rogelio Sicat using Marxist literary theory, focusing on how space reflects class struggle and social inequality. Guided by the ideas of Karl Marx and spatial theory, the research employed a qualitative design through close reading and the use of the Place–Text–Culture Analytical Matrix. The findings revealed that space functioned as a key element in portraying inequality. The cultivated fields and domestic spaces represented the working class and highlighted labor, including gendered and invisible work. In contrast, Señor Borja’s mansion symbolized class hierarchy and social exclusion. Educational spaces were shown to reproduce inequality, where privilege influenced access to opportunities. Moreover, spaces of modernity and aspiration reflected the limitations of social mobility, showing that visible progress did not necessarily lead to empowerment. The study concluded that literature reflects societal realities, revealing how power, labor, and inequality are embedded in social and physical spaces. It highlights the importance of literary analysis in promoting critical awareness of social issues.
Downloads
References
Abraham, A. M., et al. (2024). Unveiling class struggle: A Marxist Reading of Selected Filipino
Short Stories. Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 7(2), pp. 1-10.
Abraham, I. M. (2024). Unveiling class struggle: A Marxist reading of Filipino short stories. Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, pp. 390-400. https://journalajl2c.com/index.php/AJL2C/article/view/192
Acosta, V. P. K. R., Fernandez, A. D. E., Imba, S. B. A., & Engay, D. G. (2023). Exploration of Philippine literature: A Corpus-Based Study Framework. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 17(12), pp. 29–42. https://journalajarr.com/index.php/AJARR/article/view/583
Alfarhan, E. A. (2024). The Influence of Literature on the Society. International Journal of Social
Science and Humanities Research, pp. 263-270.
Ani, P. A. B., & Casasola, H. C. (2020). Transcending Barriers in Agriculture through Gender and Development. Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development. https://ap.fftc.org.tw/article/1872
Bayron, A. (2023). Challenging Issues in Rural Secondary Education. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Studies, pp. 3-5.
Cruz, M. A., et al. (2024). Rural Revitalization and Regional Development in the Philippines: Pathways Toward Inclusive and Sustainable Growth. Future Publishing House Journal, pp. 1-2.
Delos Reyes, A. (2022). Close Reading as a Method in Literary Analysis. Asian Literary Review, 8(4), 15–30.
Eagleton, T. (2019). Marxism and literary criticism. Routledge, pp. 3-7
Farmonova, S., & Khayrieva, M. I. (2024). The influence of literature on society. American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education, 2(11), pp. 283-287.
Fortaleza, G. J. (2022). Dugo sa Bukang Liwayway: A commentary on its canon formation. Academia.edu, pp. 1–2.
Garcia, R. (2024). Marxist perspectives on literature and social inequality. Philippine Journal of
Literary Studies, 5(2), pp. 45-60.
Gatcho, A. R., & Delorino, P. P. (2019). Reading short stories of F. Sionil Jose using Marxism as a Literary Vista. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies, 3–4.
Gutierrez, E. D., et al. (2025). Hanapbuhay: Coping with Informality, Risk, and Insecurity in a Philippine rice Farming Village. Taylor & Francis Online Journal, pp. 4-7.
Henson, R. (2025). Economic transformation, structural change, and inclusive growth in the Philippines: A Literature Review. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Economy and Management Study, pp. 8–15.
Lopez, J. (2021). The Place–Text–Culture Approach to Literary Space. Journal of Narrative Studies, 10(2), 34–52.
Loquias, A., et al. (2025). Unveiling social realities: A Marxist analysis of Filipino poetry. International Review of Social Sciences, pp. 241-247. https://philarchive.org/rec/LOQUSR
Nelson, I. L. (2024). Feminist Political Ecologies of Agrarian Technologies. Journal of Peasant Studies.
Olvida, I. D. G., Anastacio, N. J. C., & Leron, P. J. G. (2025). Gendered Differences in the Implementation of a Rice-Based Enterprise Program in Sariaya, Quezon Province, Philippines. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 108(1), Article 5.
Paglinawan, R. I., & Hussin, H. (2024). Phases of Filipino proletarianism in 20th century texts. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 29(1).
Reyes, M. D. (2019). Class struggle and ideology in Filipino literature. Asian Journal of Literary Criticism, 7(1), pp. 12-28.
Rivera, R. R. B. et al. (2025). Spatial Inequality in Manila: A Case study of (un)caring Urban Ethics in Jaime Cardinal Sin Village and the Manila North Cemetery. In Sustainable Development Goals Series, pp. 205–221
Santos, L. P. (2024). Cultural cartography and literary spaces in contemporary fiction. Philippine Journal of Literature and Culture, 3(1), pp. 45-67.
Tally, R. T. (2020). Topophrenia: Place, narrative, and the spatial imagination. Indiana University Press, pp. 104-112
Tally, R. Jr. (2023). Marxism and spatiality. American Book Review, pp. 137-141.
Villafuerte, J. E. S. (2024). Of text, style, and method: Edel Garcellano’s Dialectical Criticism. Entrada, 10. https://publishing.pup.edu.ph/ojs/index.php/ENTRD/article/view/384
Zamora, C. M. B., & Dorado, R. A. (2021). Rural-Urban Education Inequality in the Philippines using Decomposition Analysis. Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development, 1(1), pp. 63-71.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.