Oral Language Confidence and Reading Comprehension Performance Among Grade 6 Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19709622Keywords:
oral language confidence, reading comprehension, Grade 6 learners, literacy development, oral communication, predictive explanatory surveyAbstract
This study examined oral language confidence and reading comprehension performance among Grade 6 learners of San Antonio Elementary School in the City of Ilagan, Isabela. It employed a predictive explanatory survey design to determine the learners’ level of oral language confidence, their reading comprehension performance, the relationship between the two variables, and the predictive effect of oral language confidence on reading outcomes. Data were gathered using a validated Oral Language Confidence Scale and a Reading Comprehension Performance Test. The Oral Language Confidence Scale obtained a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.91, indicating excellent reliability. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, frequency, percentage, Spearman rho correlation, and ordinal logistic regression. Findings revealed that the learners were moderately confident in oral language activities, particularly in answering questions and reading aloud, but showed lower confidence in asking questions and explaining text meanings. Their reading comprehension performance was generally at the developing level, with greater difficulty in inferential and evaluative comprehension. A moderate positive and significant relationship was found between oral language confidence and reading comprehension performance. Ordinal logistic regression further showed that oral language confidence significantly predicted learners’ reading comprehension level. The study concluded that strengthening learners’ confidence in oral communication may contribute to improved reading comprehension. It recommended structured oral reading, retelling, guided questioning, peer discussion, and vocabulary-building activities to support both oral expression and deeper text understanding.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Colognesi, S., Coppe, T., & Lucchini, S. (2023). Improving the oral language skills of elementary school students through video-recorded performances. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, Article 104141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104141
Department of Education. (2023). General shaping paper for the MATATAG curriculum. Department of Education.
Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG curriculum: Reading and literacy curriculum guide. Department of Education.
Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Philippines country note. OECD Publishing.
Rot Vrhovec, A., & Godec Soršak, L. (2024). Students’ vocabulary and reading comprehension. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 1665–1678. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.4.1665
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Uchikoshi, Y., Yang, L., Lohr, B., & Leung, G. (2016). Role of oral proficiency on reading comprehension: Within-language and cross-language relationships. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 65(1), 236–252.
Waluyo, B., & Rofiah, N. L. (2021). Developing students’ English oral presentation skills: Do self-confidence, teacher feedback, and English proficiency matter? MEXTESOL Journal, 45(3).
Wright, T. S., & Cervetti, G. N. (2017). A systematic review of the research on vocabulary instruction that impacts text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.163
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.