Comparative Analysis of Metabolic Profiles and Body Composition Between Endomorphic and Ectomorphic Individuals

Authors

  • Naila M. Giomna South East Asian Institute of Technology, Inc. Author
  • Sher Marie L. Bade South East Asian Institute of Technology, Inc. Author
  • Detch D. Butil South East Asian Institute of Technology, Inc. Author
  • Angel Mae L. Dealdo South East Asian Institute of Technology, Inc. Author
  • Lilibeth A. Roque South East Asian Institute of Technology, Inc. Author
  • Jedidiah Rojas South East Asian Institute of Technology, Inc. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19914394

Keywords:

Ectomorph, endomorph, diabetes, body weight, FBS

Abstract

Body composition and metabolic profiles are key determinants of health, disease risk, and physical performance. Somatotyping classifies individuals into endomorphic, mesomorphic, and ectomorphic categories, reflecting differences in physique and physiological tendencies. While endomorphs are characterized by higher fat mass and a tendency to gain weight, ectomorphs typically exhibit a leaner build and difficulty in gaining mass. Understanding how these body types differ in metabolic function is essential for developing personalized health strategies. This study aimed to compare and analyze the differences in body composition and metabolic profiles between endomorphic and ectomorphic individuals. Specifically, it sought to evaluate variations in fat distribution, lean mass, resting metabolic rate, blood glucose, insulin sensitivity, and inflammatory markers, while controlling for confounding factors such as age, sex, and physical activity. A comparative descriptive quantitative research design was employed. The study was conducted in Tupi, South Cotabato, using purposive sampling to select 50 participants (25 endomorphs and 25 ectomorphs) aged 18–45 years. Data collection included anthropometric measurements, body composition analysis, and biochemical assessments such as fasting blood glucose and basal metabolic rate. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences between the groups. Findings revealed that endomorphic individuals had significantly higher body weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood sugar levels compared to ectomorphs across all age groups. Waistline measurements increased progressively with age among endomorphs, indicating greater visceral fat accumulation, while ectomorphs maintained stable measurements. A positive correlation was observed between weight and blood sugar, particularly in the endomorphic group, suggesting reduced insulin sensitivity and higher metabolic risk. The study concludes that somatotype significantly influences body composition and metabolic health. Endomorphic individuals are predisposed to higher fat mass, central obesity, and elevated glucose levels, whereas ectomorphs generally exhibit leaner profiles and better metabolic regulation. These differences highlight the importance of tailoring dietary, exercise, and clinical interventions to specific body types to optimize health outcomes and prevent metabolic diseases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baltadjiev, A., Marinova, D., & Baltadjiev, G. (2023). Somatotype and metabolic syndrome risk among adults: A comparative analysis. Journal of Endocrinological Research, 45(3), 211–220.

Baranauskas, M., Brazaitis, M., & Mickevicius, V. (2024). Somatotype characteristics and their association with nutritional and metabolic health indicators. International Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 13(1), 34–45.

Campa, F., Piras, A., Raffi, M., & Toselli, S. (2019). Somatotype impact on athletic performance in competitive male athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(10), 2802–2811.

Catellani, M., Andreoli, A., & Ferrero, A. (2022). Validation of BIA-enhanced somatotype classification across diverse populations. Journal of Human Physiology, 18(2), 102–113.

Catellani, M., Barassi, A., & Andreoli, A. (2020). Bioimpedance-integrated somatotyping: Advancements in anthropometric profiling. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 120(5), 1193–1203.

Chycki, J., Główczyński, T., Ratamess, N., Wilk, M., & Zając, A. (2019). Hormonal responses and inflammation markers across somatotypes. Journal of Metabolic Studies, 9(4), 223–231.

Dela Cruz, M., & Javier, R. (2018). Somatotype and body composition among Filipino college students. Philippine Journal of Health Research, 5(2), 58–67.

Frenzel, J., Becker, C., & Lorenz, M. (2020). Age-related changes in somatotype and metabolic markers. Geriatric Physiology Review, 14(3), 145–158.

Gutierrez, L. (2019). Aging, somatotype, and metabolic indicators among Filipino adults. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 31(1), 72–80.

Kim, S., & Park, J. (2021). Body composition and somatotype associations in Korean adults. Korean Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(2), 140–149.

Lopez, R., & Rabago, A. (2021). Functional performance and metabolic health among older Filipino adults. Philippine Journal of Gerontology, 4(1), 25–33.

Mager, P., Stein, R., & Hoffman, L. (2022). Somatotype, insulin resistance, and metabolic dysfunction. Metabolism and Obesity Review, 20(1), 55–68.

Mendoza, A., & Torralba, J. (2017). Somatotype and athletic performance among university athletes. Philippine Journal of Sports Science, 2(1), 14–22.

Mennitti, C., Barroso, R., & Silva, J. (2024). Hormonal differences and metabolic responses based on somatotype. Hormone Biology Journal, 12(2), 88–99.

Nikolaidis, P. T., & Ingebrigtsen, J. (2019). Endurance performance variation by somatotype. International Journal of Sports Physiology, 7(4), 240–249.

Nikolaidis, P. T., Rosemann, T., & Knechtle, B. (2015). Performance characteristics and somatotype profiles in athletes. Journal of Human Kinetics, 45, 187–195.

Park, H., Metwally, A. A., Delfarah, A., Lee, M., Abid, A., Cheng, S., ... & et al. (2025). Lifestyle consistency and metabolic profiling. npj Digital Medicine, 8, Article 128.

Rahman, A., Singh, P., & Torres, F. (2020). Bone mineral density variations among somatotypes. Human Biology Review, 9(1), 65–78.

Reyes, J., & Custodio, M. (2021). Diet and exercise interventions among endomorphic adults in Manila. Journal of Philippine Nutrition, 8(2), 101–115.

Rodríguez-González, E., Martínez, L., & Herrera, R. (2019). Visceral adiposity differences among somatotypes. Clinical Physiology International, 6(3), 211–223.

Santanasto, A. J., et al. (2016). Aging, adiposity, and muscle loss. Journal of Aging Studies, 45, 12–22.

Santos, E., & Villanueva, C. (2020). Metabolically obese normal-weight prevalence in Filipino adults. Philippine Journal of Internal Medicine, 58(4), 301–308.

Stefan, N., Häring, H., & Schulze, M. B. (2017). Normal-weight metabolic obesity. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 13(11), 738–751.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Giomna , N., Bade, S. M., Butil, D., Dealdo, A. M., Roque, L., & Rojas, J. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Metabolic Profiles and Body Composition Between Endomorphic and Ectomorphic Individuals. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(4), 1778-1794. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19914394

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)