Ego State and Patterns of Interaction in a Language Learning Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18622754Keywords:
Transactional Analysis, Classroom Discourse, Ego States, Teacher-Learner Interaction, Adult Ego State, Complementary Transactions, Communication Awareness, Philippine Education, Teaching and Learning Dynamics, Educational PsychologyAbstract
This study applied Transactional Analysis (TA) to classroom discourse in a Philippine setting, focusing on the identification of dominant ego states and interaction patterns between teachers and learners. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were gathered through classroom observations, audio recordings, and semi-structured interviews to capture authentic verbal exchanges and behavioral cues. The analysis revealed that the Adult ego state was most dominant among both teachers and learners, reflecting rational, objective, and data-driven communication. Complementary transactions emerged as the most frequent interaction pattern, indicating balanced exchanges where messages were appropriately received and responded to, thereby fostering effective communication. These findings suggest that maintaining an Adult ego state and encouraging complementary transactions contribute to a harmonious and productive classroom environment. To strengthen these dynamics, the study recommends communication-awareness interventions such as training sessions, reflective activities, and workshops that help teachers and students recognize their ego states, manage emotional responses, and promote healthier exchanges. By fostering awareness of interaction patterns, schools can enhance classroom relationships, reduce miscommunication, and create supportive learning environments. Beyond its practical implications, the study contributes to the theoretical understanding of psychological dynamics in classroom discourse, offering insights for educators, researchers, and policymakers interested in improving teaching and learning processes through Transactional Analysis.
Downloads
References
Alef, S. (2025). Absent strokes (Transactional analysis) [Descriptive-analytic study]. Med-Psych Journal.
Alejandro, A., & Zhao, L. (2023). Multi-method qualitative text and discourse analysis: A methodological framework. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(6), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231184421
Alipieva, D. (2017). The impact of ego states of parent, adult, and child on the professional choice of teachers. Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 8(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20172.177.192
Altun, İ., & Aydın, T. (2016). The ego states of nurses working in psychiatry clinics. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 9(2), 415–423. https://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/50_altun_original_9_2.pdf
Spilt, J. L., Spilt, T. M., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Jellesma, F. C. (2021). Coaching student teachers to improve teacher–student relationships: The LLInC approach. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 769573. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.769573
Stewart, T. (2020). Transactional analysis: Conceptualizing a framework for illuminating human experience. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000307
Tay, D. (2017). Time series analysis of discourse: A case study of metaphor in psychotherapy sessions. Discourse Studies, 19(6), 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617727187
Trudi, N. (2025). A relational transactional analysis approach in learning and education. Transactional Analysis Journal, 55(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2025.246039
Tseliou, E. (2020). A critical methodological review of discourse and conversation analysis studies of family therapy. Family Process, 59(3), 1043–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12043
Vos, J., & Rijn, B. (2018). Transactional analysis: A focused review of research literature. Transactional Analysis Journal, 48(2), 145–160.
Vos, J., & van Rijn, B. (2021). The evidence-based conceptual model of transactional analysis: A focused review of the research literature. Transactional Analysis Journal, 51(2), 160–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2021.1904364
Vos, J., & van Rijn, B. (2021). The transactional analysis review survey: An investigation into self-reported practices and philosophies of psychotherapists. Transactional Analysis Journal, 51(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2021.1904355
Vos, J., & van Rijn, B. (2022). The effectiveness of transactional analysis treatments and their predictors: A systematic literature review and explorative meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 53(3), 256–269.
Wang, C., & Esch, M. (2023). Medical students’ perceptions of feedback and interaction in online learning environments during the pandemic: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 23, 516. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04189-1
Wei, Y. (2021). Enhancing teacher–student interaction and students’ engagement in a flipped translation classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 764370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.764370
White, T. (2021). Deconfusion of the child ego state in redecision therapy. International Journal of Transactional Analysis Research & Practice, 12(2), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.29044/v12i2p14
Williams, I. C., & Glarino, G. G. (2023). The efficacy of transactional analysis as a community-based intervention for substance use disorder. Transactional Analysis Journal, 53(3), 256–269.
Xie, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 708490. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
Yoon, H. S. (2023). A review study on discourse-analytical approaches to language testing policy in South Korea. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00257-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.