The Efficiency and Constraints of the G-Suite for Education as the Learning Modality of Philippine School of Business Administration – Manila: Basis for Learning Management System Implementation

Authors

  • Dominic Q. Taday City University of Pasay Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20027487

Keywords:

G-Suite for Education, Learning Management System (LMS), Remote Teaching-Learning (RTL), Educational Efficiency, Learning Constraints, Google Classroom, Blended Learning, Flexible Learning Modality.

Abstract

This study assessed the efficiency and constraints of G-Suite for Education as the remote learning modality for the Philippine School of Business Administration (PSBA) – Manila during the 2020–2021 academic year. Utilizing a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design, the researcher surveyed 125 undergraduate students and 11 faculty members to evaluate the platform’s performance across five key indicators: instruction, delivery, learning tasks, submission, and assessment. Findings revealed that both students and faculty perceived a high level of efficiency, with faculty ratings (Strongly Agree) being slightly higher than student ratings (Agree). Most respondents utilized Google Classroom as their primary platform, citing ease of use and streamlined submission processes as significant advantages. Despite these successes, the study identified several constraints, including limited internet connectivity, reliance on mobile data, and external environmental factors such as noisy home settings and domestic responsibilities. Statistical analysis through t-tests indicated no significant difference in the perception of efficiency or constraints between the two groups, while Pearson R tests confirmed a significant relationship between these variables, suggesting that the constraints did not fundamentally undermine the platform's overall effectiveness. The study concludes that G-Suite is a viable Learning Management System (LMS) for the institution and proposes a formal Project Plan to enhance its implementation, focusing on faculty upskilling and data privacy awareness to ensure sustainable remote teaching and learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002

Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results of the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), 1–60.

Bell, K. (2020, April 11). What is G Suite for Education? What you need to know. Shake Up Learning. https://shakeuplearning.com/blog/g-suite-education-need-know/

Blair, N. (2012). Technology integration for the principal. Principal, 8–11.

Bolkan, S. (2015). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation: The mediating influence of affective learning and student engagement. Communication Reports, 28(2), 80–91.

Bustamante, C. B. S. (2018). Higher education research in the Philippines: Policies and prospects. In Researching Higher Education in Asia (pp. 287–295). Springer.

Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1980). Research methods in education. Croom Helm Ltd.

Delas Peñas, E. (2020, August 19). Challenges of online learning vs traditional learning for students. SDSN Youth Philippines. https://covid19.sdsnyouthph.org/article.php?id=51

Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. (2003). Moodle: Using learning communities to create an open source course management system. Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2003 Conference.

Espinosa, N., Estira, K. L., & Ventayen, R. J. M. (2017). Usability evaluation of Google Classroom: Basis for the adaptation of G-Suite e-learning platform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts, and Science, 5(1). https://apjeas.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/APJEAS-2018.5.1.05.pdf

Esteves, K. K. (2012). Exploring Facebook to enhance learning and student engagement: A case from the University of Philippines (UP) Open University. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 14(1).

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2006). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.

Google. (n.d.). Helping K-12 educators make a greater impact. Google for Education. https://edu.google.com/why-google/k-12-solutions/

Google Cloud Blog. (2015, December). New in Classroom: Saving time while grading. https://cloud.googleblog.com/2015/12/new-in-Classroom-saving-time-while-grading.html

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.

Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16(1), 21–46.

Hinkelman, D. (2018). Evolution of blended learning. In Blending Technologies in Second Language Classrooms (pp. 1–21). Palgrave Macmillan.

Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Wang, S.-Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473.

Iftakhar, R. (2016). Google Classroom: What works and how? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12–18. [Note: Referenced as 'Capabilities of Google Classroom' in source]. https://www.academia.edu/37829099/

Keppler, M., Weiler, S. C., & Maas, D. (2014). Focused ubiquity: A purposeful approach to providing learners with laptops. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 370–381.

Lin, Y.-T., & Jou, M. (2013). Integrating popular web applications in classroom learning environments and its effects on teaching, learner learning motivation and performance. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 157–165.

Liu, H.-C., & Chuang, H.-H. (2016). Integrating Google Classroom to teach writing in Taiwan [Paper presentation]. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Innovation.

Machado, L. J., & Chung, C.-J. (2015). Integrating technology: The principals’ role and effect. International Education Studies, 8(5), 43–53.

Mafa, K. R., & Govender, W. D. (2017). Perceptions of learners towards the use of mobile devices in improving academic performance: A case of a senior secondary school in a developing country. International Journal of Sciences and Research, 73.

Mafa, K. R., & Govender, W. D. (2018). The use of mobile technology devices in Botswana secondary schools to enhance teaching and learning. International Journal of Sciences and Research, 74(8).

Martínez-Monés, A., Reffay, C., Torío, J. H., & Cristóbal, J. A. M. (2017). Learning analytics with Google Classroom: Exploring the possibilities. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 47:1–47:6.

Mayes, T., & De Freitas, S. (2004). Review of e-learning theories, frameworks and models. JISC e-Learning Models Study.

Mayes, T., & de Freitas, S. (2007). Learning and e-learning. In Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age (pp. 13–25). Routledge.

Melton, J. (2006). The LMS Moodle: A usability evaluation. Prefectural University of Kumamoto.

Nizam, H. I. (2016). Factors affecting students' use of Google Apps for Education in developing countries (A case study of University of Benin undergraduates). https://www.academia.edu/25644946/

Ouyang, J. R., & Stanley, N. (2014). Theories and research in educational technology and distance learning instruction through Blackboard. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 161–172.

Stat Trek. (n.d.). Stratified random samples. https://stattrek.com/sample-size/stratified-sample.aspx

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage.

Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)–A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60–A68.

Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (2000). Teaching by machine. In Teaching by Machine (pp. 247–254).

Zabala, J. V. (2018). Teaching in clouds: Using the G Suite for Education for the delivery of two English for Academic Purposes courses. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329601079_TEACHING_IN_CLOUDS_USING_THE_G_SUITE_FOR_EDUCATION_FOR_THE_DELIVERY_OF_TWO_ENGLISH_FOR_ACADEMIC_PURPOSES_COURSES

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Taday, D. (2026). The Efficiency and Constraints of the G-Suite for Education as the Learning Modality of Philippine School of Business Administration – Manila: Basis for Learning Management System Implementation. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 131-162. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20027487

Similar Articles

11-20 of 246

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.