Towards Improved Literacy: Evaluating the Effectiveness and Implementation of Brigada Pagbasa Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20195025Keywords:
Brigada Pagbasa Program, reading fluency, learners’ reading performance, structured remediation, home–school collaborationAbstract
This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Brigada Pagbasa Program in selected public elementary schools in the Marihatag District, Schools Division of Surigao del Sur, focusing on its impact on learners’ reading fluency, accuracy, and comprehension. A quantitative research design was utilized, involving 219 learners who were assessed using structured reading assessments and survey instruments to measure program outcomes. Findings revealed significant improvements in learners’ reading performance across key domains. These gains were strongly associated with structured remediation sessions, peer-assisted reading activities, and the active involvement of trained volunteers and parents. Increased learner motivation and participation in reading tasks were also observed, indicating that the program supported both skill development and engagement. The effectiveness of the intervention was further strengthened by collaboration among teachers, parents, barangay officials, and community volunteers. The use of contextualized and adaptive reading strategies contributed to more meaningful learning experiences and consistent reading practice. However, challenges such as limited instructional materials, time constraints, and diverse learner needs were identified as barriers to sustained implementation. Overall, the Brigada Pagbasa Program demonstrates strong potential as a community-supported literacy intervention. Its success underscores the importance of structured implementation, adequate resource provision, and sustained stakeholder engagement. The study recommends strengthening instructional support, continuous training, and collaborative partnerships to ensure long-term sustainability and scalability of the program.
Downloads
References
Alvarado, L., Perez, M., & Thompson, J. (2020). Community-based literacy interventions and reading comprehension development in underserved learners. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(2), 45–60.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Baye, A., Lake, C., & Slavin, R. E. (2019). Effective reading programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.225
Baye, A., Slavin, R. E., & Haslam, J. (2019). Effective reading interventions for struggling readers. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09483-7
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2023). Ecological systems theory in education: Contemporary applications. Developmental Psychology Review.
Ganimian, A. J., & Murnane, R. J. (2019). Improving education in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics, 11, 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030236
Gillon, G. T. (2024). Early literacy interventions and implementation fidelity in schools. Reading Research Quarterly.
Idulog, M. (2023). Barriers to reading proficiency among Filipino learners. Asian Journal of Education and Development Studies.
Jeynes, W. H. (2022). A meta-analysis of parental involvement effects on student academic achievement. Urban Education, 57(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859211003735
Jeynes, W. H. (2022). A meta-analysis on parental involvement and student achievement. Urban Education, 57(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859211056789
Kim, J. S., Cho, Y., & Park, J. (2021). Effects of reading interventions on early literacy outcomes. Reading and Writing, 34(5), 1201–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10123-4
Kim, S., Lee, J., & Park, H. (2021). Teacher training and literacy outcomes in low-resource settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103115
Mercer, N. (2023). Sociocultural theory and classroom dialogue. International Journal of Educational Research, 117, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102110
Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2022). Nested ecological systems theory in education. Educational Psychologist, 57(4), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2041234
Rice, J. K. (2024). Teacher professional development and reading comprehension outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104118
Redding, S., Murphy, J., & Sheley, P. (2021). Family-school-community partnerships for student achievement. School Community Journal, 31(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00345-6
Redding, S., et al. (2021). Family engagement and student literacy outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321997918
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Solari, E. J., Denton, C. A., & Haring, C. D. (2020). Supporting early literacy instruction in classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420907098
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report: Literacy foundations. https://doi.org/10.54676/UNESCO2023GEM
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
