Effects Of Coal, Wood, And Crop Ashes on the Compressive Strength and Water Absorption of Eco-Friendly Building Blocks

Authors

  • Cybelle A. Gonzales Cebu City Don Carlos A. Gothong Memorial National High School C. Padilla St., Cebu City, Philippines Author
  • Redjie C. Megallos Cebu City Don Carlos A. Gothong Memorial National High School C. Padilla St., Cebu City, Philippines Author
  • Ian Poecholo Ignacio Cebu City Don Carlos A. Gothong Memorial National High School C. Padilla St., Cebu City, Philippines Author
  • Marlixis Angela R. Cao Cebu City Don Carlos A. Gothong Memorial National High School C. Padilla St., Cebu City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20405367

Keywords:

ash-based bricks, coal ash, sustainable construction, compressive strength, moisture content

Abstract

This study explored the use of coal ash, wood ash, and crop ashes as alternative materials in producing eco-friendly building blocks. The research aimed to determine whether these waste materials could serve as sustainable substitutes while maintaining acceptable physical and structural properties. Using a quasi-experimental research design, ash-based bricks were compared with commercially available bricks in terms of dimensions, moisture content, and compressive strength. Findings revealed that the ash-based bricks had dimensions comparable to commercial bricks, indicating that the materials were suitable for brick formation and molding. In terms of moisture content, the ash-based bricks met the acceptable standard range, suggesting good water retention and bonding properties during curing. Statistical analysis also showed a significant difference in moisture content between ash-based and commercial bricks. For compressive strength, the ash-based bricks demonstrated acceptable performance during the drop test; however, variations in strength were observed among the samples, indicating inconsistencies in material composition and curing conditions. Although some ash-based bricks performed well, commercial bricks exhibited more stable and reliable structural performance overall. Despite these limitations, the findings suggest that coal, wood, and crop ashes have potential as sustainable materials for construction applications. Overall, the study highlights the possibility of transforming agricultural and industrial waste into useful construction materials that may help reduce environmental waste while supporting sustainable and low-cost building practices. Further improvement in the production process is recommended to achieve more consistent structural performance and enhance the practical application of ash-based bricks in the construction industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASTM International. (2020). Standard test methods for sampling and testing brick and structural clay tile (ASTM C67-20). ASTM International.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin.

Chowdhury, S., Maniar, A., & Suganya, O. (2021). Strength and durability of concrete using agricultural waste ash. Construction and Building Materials, 310, 125123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125123

Gehander, J., & Mörnhed, M. (2020). Urbanization and housing challenges in developing countries: Trends and solutions. Urban Studies, 57(4), 812–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020902421

Hinojosa, J., Rodríguez, J., & Martínez, F. (2014). Renewable energy and biomass utilization: Global perspectives. Renewable Energy, 66, 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.041

Laskar, A., Talukdar, S., & Dutta, A. (2022). Biomass ash in sustainable concrete: Performance and environmental benefits. Construction and Building Materials, 349, 128743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128743

Martirena, F., & Monzó, J. (2018). Agricultural ashes as supplementary cementitious materials: Properties and applications. Cement and Concrete Composites, 88, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.02.001

Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, properties, and materials (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of concrete (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Pacheco da Costa, J., Quinteiro, P., & Dias, A. C. (2019). Technical viability and environmental impact of biomass in construction materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.145

Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018). Eco-efficient cements: Potential, economically viable solutions for a low-CO₂ cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015

Thomas, S., Harilal, B., & Mathews, M. S. (2021). Characteristics and performance of biomass ashes in concrete: Mechanical and durability aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125895

UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

Zhang, T., Cheeseman, C., & Vandeperre, L. (2022). Development of low-carbon construction materials using industrial and agricultural waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 350, 131419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131419

Downloads

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Gonzales, C., Megallos, R., Ignacio, I. P., & Cao, M. A. (2026). Effects Of Coal, Wood, And Crop Ashes on the Compressive Strength and Water Absorption of Eco-Friendly Building Blocks. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 1689-1696. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20405367

Similar Articles

21-30 of 227

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.