School Heads’ Strategic Adaptation, Leadership Resiliency and Practices Towards Organizational Change

Authors

  • Janine V. Sarenas Wesleyan University-Philippines, Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20405566

Keywords:

school heads, strategic adaptation, leadership resiliency, organizational change, educational leadership, school improvement

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examined school heads’ strategic adaptation, leadership resiliency, and organizational change practices in the District of San Luis. Specifically, it described respondents’ profile, assessed strategic adaptation in terms of strategic flexibility and planning, stakeholder-driven adaptation, and data-driven and reflective adaptation, examined leadership resiliency in personal, emotional, interpersonal, cognitive, and strategic dimensions, and determined the relationships between strategic adaptation, resiliency, and organizational change practices. Using an explanatory sequential design, data were gathered from 23 school heads and 26 master teachers or teachers holding the highest position through total enumeration. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, median, and Spearman’s rank correlation, while qualitative responses were interpreted thematically to clarify and support the statistical patterns. Findings showed that respondents were generally mid-career, well-educated, and professionally experienced educators. School heads demonstrated strong strategic adaptation, high leadership resiliency, and highly evident organizational change practices. Significant relationships were found between strategic flexibility planning and emotional resilience, between strategic flexibility planning and interpersonal resilience, between data-driven and reflective adaptation and interpersonal resilience, between stakeholder-driven adaptation and internal and external stakeholder participation, and between data-driven and reflective adaptation and school leadership. However, some correlations were weak or nonsignificant, indicating that organizational change is shaped not only by flexibility but also by stakeholder engagement, data use, reflective leadership, and institutional context. The study concludes that resilient, participatory, and data-informed leadership strengthens schools’ capacity to manage organizational change. It recommends leadership development programs focusing on resilience, stakeholder co-creation, reflective action research, innovation, resource mobilization, and mentoring.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2022). Transformational leadership (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003229391

Bautista, M. C., Dela Cruz, J. P., & Santos, L. R. (2023). Challenges and opportunities in implementing educational reforms in Philippine schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Administration, 15(2), 45-58.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Brundrett, M., & Duncan, D. (2022). Leading curriculum innovation in primary schools. Management in Education.

Burke, W. W. (2020). Organization change: Theory and practice (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cahapay, M. B. (2022). The phenomenon of leading without a guidebook: Educational leadership practices of Philippine school principals in the context of COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 10(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2022.7666

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge.

Department of Education. (2012). Implementation of the School-Based Management (SBM) Framework, Assessment Process and Tool (DepEd Order No. 83, s. 2012). Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2021). School-based management validation tool and implementation guidelines. Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2023). The MATATAG Curriculum: Reinforcing foundational learning and holistic development. Department of Education.

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134-2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.

Fullan, M. (2021). The new meaning of educational change (6th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Ganon-Shilon, S., Schechter, C., & Qadach, M. (2021). Adaptive leadership in schools: Coping with change and reform through collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(5), 590-606. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2020- 0118

Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2013). Challenges to teacher resilience: Conditions count. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 22-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.623152

Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press.

Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Harvard Business Review Press.

Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2022). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world (2nd ed.). Harvard Business Press.

Konakli, T. (2022). Educational leadership in times of reform: The role of school heads in managing change. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(4), 567-582.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2021). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 41(1-2), 5-22.

Luthans, F. (2021). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (15th ed.). Information Age Publishing.

Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316472.001.0001

Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. McGraw-Hill.

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2005). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management (2nd ed.). Free Press.

Northouse, P. G. (2023). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Onan, G., Sürücü, L., Bekmezci, M., Dalmış, A. B., & Sunman, G. (2025). Relationships between positive leadership styles, psychological resilience, and burnout: An empirical study among Turkish teachers. Behavioral Sciences, 15(6), Article 713. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060713

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). School leadership for learning: Insights from TALIS 2018. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6f0d5c8a-en

Pulakos, E. D., Kantrowitz, T. M., & Schneider, R. J. (2021). Adaptive performance: Navigating change at work. Routledge.

Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2018). Management (14th ed.). Pearson Education.

Schein, E. H. (2019). Organizational culture and leadership (6th ed.). Wiley.

UNESCO. (2023). Leadership for curriculum implementation and reform in schools. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Warren, S., & Miller, K. (2020). Educational leadership in the 21st century: Building resilience and adaptability. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Sarenas, J. (2026). School Heads’ Strategic Adaptation, Leadership Resiliency and Practices Towards Organizational Change . International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 1711-1719. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20405566

Similar Articles

71-80 of 286

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.