Assessment of Servant Leadership, Adversity Quotient, Challenges Encountered, and Coping Mechanisms of United Methodist School Administrators for a Professional Development Plan

Authors

  • Rose Anne Velasco-Cayabyab Dr. Gloria D. Lacson Foundation Colleges, Inc. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20476459

Keywords:

servant leadership, adversity quotient, school administrators, coping mechanisms, educational leadership, professional development plan

Abstract

This descriptive-correlational study assessed servant leadership behavior, adversity quotient, challenges encountered, and coping mechanisms among school administrators in the South Nueva Ecija Philippines Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church as the basis for a professional development plan. Total enumeration was used to include 82 administrators from 10 United Methodist schools. Data were gathered through survey instruments measuring five dimensions of servant leadership, four dimensions of adversity quotient, six areas of challenges encountered, and three coping mechanisms. Descriptive statistics and Pearson product-moment correlation were used for analysis. Results showed that servant leadership behavior was generally evident (overall weighted mean = 3.95), with organizational stewardship receiving the highest rating (M = 4.19). Administrators demonstrated moderate to favorable adversity responses, particularly in endurance (M = 4.07), and frequently used problem-focused (M = 4.16) and emotion-focused coping (M = 3.93), while avoidant coping was used sometimes (M = 3.39). Significant relationships were found between servant leadership and challenges encountered, servant leadership and coping mechanisms, adversity quotient and challenges encountered, adversity quotient and coping mechanisms, and challenges encountered and coping mechanisms. The findings indicate that servant-oriented leadership, resilience, and constructive coping operate together in supporting school administrators as they address organizational, instructional, technological, and community-related demands. A professional development plan focusing on servant leadership, adversity management, communication, technology integration, and healthier coping strategies is recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, D., & Muthiah, V. (2020). School principals and 21st century leadership challenges: A systematic review. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 5(1), 189-210. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol5iss1pp189-210

Al-Shamri, A. (2019). The administrative obstacles facing primary school principals in Ha'el and means for overcoming those obstacles from the perspective of principals. The Arab Journal for Educational and Psychological Sciences, 11, 193-232.

Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92-100.

Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132.

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.

Lee, A., Lyubovnikova, J., Tian, A. W., & Knight, C. (2021). Servant leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 489-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12346

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002

Rachmawati, A. W., & Lantu, D. C. (2014). Servant leadership theory development and measurement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.445

Shaw, J., & Newton, J. (2014). Teacher retention and satisfaction with a servant leader as principal. Education, 135(1), 101-106.

Stoltz, P. G. (2017). Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities. Wiley.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Rose Anne, V.-C. (2026). Assessment of Servant Leadership, Adversity Quotient, Challenges Encountered, and Coping Mechanisms of United Methodist School Administrators for a Professional Development Plan. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 1929-1937. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20476459

Similar Articles

11-20 of 340

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.