Implementation of Agrarian Reform Community Connectivity and Economic Support Services Project and Empowerment of Agrarian Reform Organizations

Authors

  • Cherry Ann S. Tagod Camiguin Polytechnic State College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20612212

Keywords:

ARCCESS Project, agrarian reform beneficiary organizations, rural development, organizational empowerment, agricultural support services, Camiguin Province

Abstract

This study assessed the extent of implementation of the Agrarian Reform Community Connectivity and Economic Support Services (ARCCESS) Project among Agrarian Reform Beneficiary Organizations (ARBOs) in Camiguin Province and identified the operational challenges experienced by members. A quantitative descriptive survey design was employed. The respondents were 335 agrarian reform beneficiaries who were members of ARBOs in Mambajao, Mahinog, Guinsiliban, Sagay, and Catarman. A validated and pilot-tested questionnaire was used; its reliability coefficient was Cronbach's alpha = 0.81. Frequency counts and percentages described the respondents' profile, weighted mean and standard deviation measured the extent of implementation, an independent-samples t-test and one-way analysis of variance tested differences across demographic groups, and ranking identified operational challenges. The ARCCESS Project was implemented to a high extent (total average weighted mean = 3.74; SD = 0.46). Its strongest areas were support for sustainable ARBO activities (WM = 3.98), development of officers' skills (WM = 3.97), and livelihood or income-generating activities (WM = 3.97). No significant differences were found when implementation was assessed according to sex, age, household size, or municipal affiliation. Low cooperation among members in operational tasks emerged as the most pressing concern. The findings support continued technical assistance, transparent resource allocation, stronger member participation, and closer coordination among DAR, LGUs, and ARBOs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANGOC (Asian NGO Coalition for Agrarian Reform and Rural Development). (2021). Rural development and agrarian reform: Lessons from implementation gaps. ANGOC Publications.

Ballesteros, M. M., & Ancheta, J. A. (2021). Linking agrarian reform beneficiary organizations (ARBOs) to agriculture value chain: Lessons from farmer organizations in selected regions of the Philippines (PIDS Research Paper Series No. 2021-09). Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Ballesteros, M. M., & Ancheta, J. A. (2022). Public-private partnerships in agriculture value chains: The case of Project ConVERGE in the Philippines (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2022-03). Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Bautista, R., & Mercado, J. (2021). Institutional support and empowerment of agrarian reform beneficiaries in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 65(2), 44-60.

Bayudan-Dacuycuy, C., Ballesteros, M. M., Baje, L. K., & Ancheta, J. A. (2022). Sustainable value chain financing for smallholder agricultural production in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Development, 49(1).

Cruz, A., & Ramos, L. (2020). Empowering rural cooperatives: Challenges and innovations in the ARCCESS framework. Asian Journal of Development Studies, 14(3), 112-130.

Department of Agrarian Reform. (n.d.). Agrarian Reform Community Connectivity and Economic Support Services (ARCCESS). https://www.dar.gov.ph/services/technical-advisory-support-services/arccess

Department of Agrarian Reform. (2015). ARCCESS project implementation manual. DAR Policy and Planning Service.

Department of Agrarian Reform. (2020). SPLIT and ARCCESS program implementation updates. DAR Central Office.

Land Bank of the Philippines & Department of Agrarian Reform. (n.d.). Credit facilitation under ARCCESS support services. https://www.dar.gov.ph/services/technical-advisory-support-services/arccess

Maghirang, P. K. B., Quicoy, A. R., & Maghirang, M. A. T. (2022). Cooperative-led green value chain development for selected highland vegetables in Buguias, Benguet. Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development, 7(2), 1-15.

Mercado, J., Coloma, M., Baltazar, P., & Torres, D. (2021). Evaluation of the Agrarian Reform Community Connectivity and Economic Support Services (ARCCESS) in Nueva Ecija. Philippine Journal of Rural Development, 12(1), 20-42.

Miano, L. C., Cabrera, G. A., Yaoc, C. A. M., Cayabat, C. V., & Laguador, A. A. (2025). Developing community-based enterprises from selected agrarian reform communities in Quezon Province. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 15(1).

Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation & Department of Agrarian Reform. (n.d.). Agri-insurance component under ARCCESS support services. https://www.dar.gov.ph/services/technical-advisory-support-services/arccess

Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2023). Enhancing agricultural productivity and organizational sustainability under ARCCESS: Policy insights and implications. PIDS Policy Notes.

Sanchez, J. (2020). Institutional mechanisms and policy coherence in agrarian reform support programs. University of the Philippines School of Economics Working Paper.

Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

SEARCA (Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture). (2022). Sustainability assessment of ARBO-managed enterprises under ARCCESS. SEARCA Research Report Series.

World Bank. (2006). Empowerment in practice: From analysis to implementation. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/8835

Downloads

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

Tagod, C. A. (2026). Implementation of Agrarian Reform Community Connectivity and Economic Support Services Project and Empowerment of Agrarian Reform Organizations. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 667-674. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20612212

Similar Articles

71-80 of 352

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.