Maritime Security Awareness and Community Resilience in Contested Coastal Environments

Authors

  • Mark Adrian Antonio Northeastern College Author
  • Glenda G. Mina Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20643717

Keywords:

Coastal communities, community resilience, contested coastal environments, livelihood continuity, maritime security awareness, Palawan

Abstract

This study was anchored on the growing need to understand maritime security from the standpoint of coastal communities living near contested waters. It determined the level of maritime security awareness and community resilience in contested coastal environments, with emphasis on how local people understood maritime risks, safety advisories, rights and responsibilities at sea, reporting channels, and community-based response procedures. The study used a community-centered predictive correlational design with a contextual descriptive component. Data were gathered from coastal community respondents in selected areas of Palawan through a validated and reliability-tested survey questionnaire. The instrument obtained an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.94, indicating excellent internal consistency. Weighted mean, standard deviation, Spearman’s rho correlation, and bootstrapped multiple regression were used to analyze the data. Results showed that maritime security awareness was high, although knowledge of reporting and assistance channels and familiarity with response procedures remained moderate. Community resilience was also high, with social cooperation as the strongest area, while livelihood continuity, adaptive capacity, and preparedness for maritime-related disruptions needed further strengthening. A significant strong positive relationship was found between maritime security awareness and community resilience. Regression results further revealed that awareness of maritime risks, understanding of safety advisories, and awareness of rights and responsibilities at sea significantly predicted community resilience. The findings indicate that informed communities are better positioned to cope with maritime uncertainty, but awareness must be supported by clear reporting systems, practical preparedness mechanisms, and livelihood assistance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baviera, A. S. P. (2016). Territorial and maritime disputes in the West Philippine Sea: Foreign policy choices and their impact on domestic stakeholders. Public Policy, 15(2), 12–49.

Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2017). Beyond seablindness: A new agenda for maritime security studies. International Affairs, 93(6), 1293–1311. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix174

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, & B. Rama, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844

Khan, M. I. (2026). Law enforcement issues in the disputed maritime areas: Apples and pears for the coastal states. Frontiers in Marine Science, 12, Article 1690709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1690709

Li, L. (2023). Building up a sustainable path to maritime security: An analytical framework and its policy applications. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086757

McCabe, R. (2023). Environmental drivers of maritime insecurity: Governance, enforcement and resilience in the western Indian Ocean. Conflict, Security & Development, 23(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2023.2256251

Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2016). The South China Sea Arbitration: The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China, PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award of 12 July 2016. Permanent Court of Arbitration.

Steven, A. D. L., Appeaning Addo, K., Llewellyn, G., Vu, T. C., et al. (2020). Coastal development: Resilience, restoration and infrastructure requirements. World Resources Institute.

Wu, H. (2026). The concept, mechanism and vision of global maritime security governance. Frontiers in Marine Science, 13, Article 1846839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2026.1846839

Downloads

Published

2026-06-11

How to Cite

Antonio, M. A., & Mina, G. (2026). Maritime Security Awareness and Community Resilience in Contested Coastal Environments. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 867-878. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20643717

Similar Articles

11-20 of 196

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)