Level of Adherence to Standard-Based School Improvement Plan of Marcelino Fule Memorial College: Basis for a Proposed Plan of Action

Authors

  • Nestor V. Yema Jr. Pacific International College, Las Piñas City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18725313

Keywords:

School Improvement Plan, Accountability Theory, Republic Act 9155, School-Based Management, Educational Reform, Stakeholder Participation, Academic Achievement, Resource Management, Governance In Education

Abstract

This study investigates the extent of implementation of the School Improvement Plan (SIP) in Marcelino Fule Memorial College, Sta. Cruz, Philippines, within the framework of Republic Act No. 9155, the Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. Anchored on Accountability Theory, the research examines how SIP functions as a roadmap for enhancing access, quality, and governance in education by involving school heads, teachers, parents, and learners in collaborative planning. Specifically, the study evaluates SIP implementation through performance indicators such as participation rate, cohort survival rate, retention rate, graduation rate, dropout rate, and academic achievement, alongside dimensions of goal setting, resource management, accountability, and timelines. Employing a descriptive-developmental design, data were gathered from 115 respondents (school head, teachers, and parents) using survey questionnaires and validated through virtual focus group discussions. Findings reveal that SIP implementation moderately addresses performance targets and accountability measures, while showing improvements in enrolment, participation, and academic achievement. Challenges include limited resources, health conditions, and inadequate facilities, which hinder full adherence to standards-based SIP. The study concludes that SIP serves as a vital accountability mechanism, fostering stakeholder engagement and providing schools with evidence-based strategies for continuous improvement. A proposed plan of action is recommended to strengthen resource mobilization, stakeholder participation, and monitoring systems to ensure sustainable educational outcomes. Ultimately, the research underscores SIP’s role as both a developmental tool and a public accountability instrument in advancing learner success and institutional performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abulencia, A. A. (n.d.). School-based management: A structural reform intervention. Center for Linkages and Extension, Philippine Normal University.

Alyamani, H. (2016). Targeted areas of school improvement in Saudi Arabia.

Bjorkman, C. (2008). Internal capacities for school improvement: Principals’ views in Swedish secondary schools.

Cabardo, J. (2016). Levels of participation of school stakeholders in school-initiated activities and the implementation of school-based management.

Cantón Mayo, I. (2009). Modelo sistémico de evaluación de planes de mejora. Universidad de León, Área de Publicaciones.

Corcoran, J. (2003). Self-managing school. Falmer Press.

Department of Education. (2006a). Handbook for the preparation of the school improvement plan. Author.

Department of Education. (2006b). Primer on school-community partnership. Author.

Department of Education. (2006c). Primer on school-based management program. Author.

Department of Education. (2012). Implementing guidelines on the revised school-based management (SBM) framework, assessment process and tool (APAT) (DepEd Order No. 83, s. 2012). Author.

Department for Education. (2017). All schools and colleges in England: Find and compare schools. Government of the United Kingdom.

Escobar, I. (2019). School improvement plans: A tool to improve the quality of education. ProSocial Behavior Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v6i1.4197

Kannapel, P. (2000). Standards-based reform and rural school improvement: Finding the middle ground. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 16(3), 202–208.

Konok, I. (2011). Sustainable school improvement: A case study of the needs of two Bangladeshi schools.

Ministry of Education. (2008). National report on education development in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Author.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).

Pacadaljen, L. (2021). Implementation of school improvement plan in Samar and Catbalogan City divisions.

Republic Act No. 9155. (2001). Governance of basic education act of 2001 (Philippines).

San Miguel, V. (2019). The importance of school improvement plan.

Tapayan, H., Ebio, F., & Bentor, C. (2016). Impact of school-based management level of practices among secondary school implementing units on the K to 12 program implementation in Leyte Division, Philippines. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(—), ISSN 2277-9655.

UNESCO. (2011). World data on education: Saudi Arabia (7th ed.). International Bureau of Education.

World Bank. (2007, November). What is school-based management.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-21

How to Cite

Yema, N. (2026). Level of Adherence to Standard-Based School Improvement Plan of Marcelino Fule Memorial College: Basis for a Proposed Plan of Action. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(2), 712-746. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18725313

Similar Articles

31-40 of 127

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.