The Core: An Instructional Learning Package for Core Competencies in Computer Systems Servicing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18725378Keywords:
Computer Systems Servicing, instructional learning package, TESDA, core competencies, DepEd curriculum, National Certificate II, educational innovation, resource evaluation, TLE-ICT, LRMDSAbstract
This study aimed to develop and evaluate an instructional learning package for core competencies in Computer Systems Servicing (CSS) using a descriptive–developmental–evaluative research design. The respondents included 75 Grade 10 TLE–ICT CSS students, two CSS teachers, two TESDA assessors, one Learning Resources Management and Development System (LRMDS) supervisor, and one Education Program Supervisor in Camarines Norte. Results showed that only a small percentage of students could potentially pass the four Core Competency Clusters (COCs) based on the TESDA Self-Assessment Guide, and none qualified for the National Certificate II (NC II), indicating insufficient readiness for national certification. To address this gap, an instructional learning package titled “THE CORE” was developed, consisting of four print modules, a teacher’s guide, and non-print resources such as interactive PowerPoint presentations and instructional videos. The package integrated four core competencies: installing and configuring computer systems, setting up computer networks, setting up computer servers, and maintaining and repairing computer systems and networks. Evaluation using the LRMDS rating sheet revealed that both print and non-print resources met the required standards for content, format, presentation, organization, instructional quality, and technical quality, with minor revisions recommended for accuracy and visual design. The study concluded that although students were not yet ready to take the NC II assessment, the developed instructional learning package provided an effective and innovative resource aligned with the Department of Education CSS curriculum and TESDA standards. It is recommended that the package be enhanced through regular updates, increased hands-on competency-based assessments, and wider implementation in both Junior and Senior High School to strengthen learners’ mastery of core competencies and improve readiness for national certification.
Downloads
References
Affilianto, A. (2017). Validity and effectiveness of a physics learning package based on the guided-inquiry model. University of the Philippines Journal, 28–35.
Aguilar, E. S., De Guzman, A. B., & De Castro, B. (2016). The use of art in the development and validation of a prototype constructivist-oriented learning package in secondary mathematics. Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology, 22–38.
Alaba, S. O., & Tayo, O. K. (2014). A study of the effectiveness of socio-drama learning package in promoting environmental knowledge and behavior of secondary school students in Osun State, Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 1325–1330.
Ardinez, D. G. (2001). Development and evaluation of the student module discovering the rudiments of magnetism (Project paper). De La Salle University.
Beal, V. (2012). Webopedia. https://www.webopedia.com
Bell, M. (1997). Designing and using a learning package for teaching. University of Wollongong Teaching and Learning Journal, 1–32.
Bell, M. (1998). Designing and using a learning package for teaching. University of Wollongong Australia Journal, 24–26.
Bongala, L. A. (2017). ASPIRE: A learning module in teaching junior entrepreneurship (Unpublished master’s thesis). Mabini Colleges, Daet, Camarines Norte.
Chuthapisith, J., di Mambro, B., & Doody, G. (2009). Effectiveness of computer-assisted learning (CAL) package to raise awareness of autism. BioMed Central, 1–6.
de Sousa, J. C. (2015). How to deliver a successful learning package for family medicine trainees. World Book of Family Medicine Journal, 1–3.
Guilbert, A. (2008). Educational handbook for health personnel. World Health Organization.
Gunn, A., & Pitt, S. J. (2003). The effectiveness of computer-based teaching packages in supporting student learning of parasitology. Bioscience Education, 225–232.
Gunn, A., & Pitt, S. J. (2015). The effectiveness of computer-based teaching packages in supporting student learning of parasitology. Bioscience Education, 50–62.
Hiran, W. K., Onkasem, T., Sethakomkun, P., Chanajanasak, S., & Athipanapong, P. (2019). Development of learning packages, innovation, and local wisdom for Grade 6 students using participatory learning and metacognitive experiences integrated with community-based learning. Journal of Education Thaksin University, 18–29.
Jhpiego. (2019). Learning resource packages. https://reprolineplus.org/resources/trainer- educator/learningresource-packages
Kapfer, P. G., & Ovard, G. F. (1971). Preparing individualized learning packages for ungraded, continuous progress education.
Kaur, R., Sharma, K., & Singh, S. (2015). Effectiveness of multimedia approach on the academic achievement of Class 8 students in English. International Journal of Applied Research, 467–471.
Khadjooi, K. (2011). How to use Gagné’s model of instructional design in teaching psychomotor skills.
Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases.
Kumar, R., & Kaur, G. (2016). Influence of metacognition-integrated learning package on the academic achievement of B.Ed. trainee teachers. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 120–123.
Long, A. (2004). The evaluation of three computer-assisted learning packages for general dental practitioners. British Dental Journal, 410–415.
Magulod, G. C. (2017). Evaluation of multisensory instructional material package for elementary learners.
Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 83–93.
Mangunay, K. (2013, June 10). Learning packages, not textbooks, for K to 12. Philippine Daily Inquirer,
p. 2.
McLeod, S. (2019). What is the zone of proximal development? https://www.simplypsychology.org/zoneof-proximal-development.html
Miller, P. J. (1990). Developing self-learning packages. Journal of Nursing Staff Development, 73–77.
Murtafiah, S., Masrura, Indrawati, N., Arsyad, N., & Awi. (2018). The practicality and effectiveness of a metacognitive-based learning package to build students’ character. International Journal of Education and Research, 339–348.
Nikolajski, P. Y. (2002). Investigating the effectiveness of self-learning packages in staff development.
Journal of Nursing Staff Development, 179–183.
Nuestro, S. A. (2018). Computer systems servicing Android-based simulation: A strategic mobile learning model for students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 547–551.
Ramirez, M. G. (2001). Research-based self-learning packages on ecological concepts (Unpublished master’s thesis). Mariano Marcos State University.
Richey, R. C. (2017, September 2). Descriptive developmental evaluation approach. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/id=ID37353
Saludadez, J. A. (2001). Development and evaluation of learning packages in research management
(Unpublished master’s thesis). University of the Philippines Los Baños.
Sawangsri, B. (2016). Learning package using inductive teaching with group process. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 618–621.
Smart Communications, Inc. (2018). Smart donates digital learning packages for Basilan learners. https://smart.com.ph/About/newsroom/full-news/2018/03/19/smart-donates-digital- learningpackages-for-basilan-learners
Taurista, K., Sari, M. S., & Rohman, F. (2017). Developing a learning package on cells and tissues based on guided inquiry and integration of local knowledge. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 32–37.
TESDA. (2013). Training regulation: Electronics sector (CSS).
UNICEF. (2019). UNICEF school-in-a-bag package improves learning in Region VIII. https://www.unicef.org/philippines/press-releases/unicefs-school-bag-package-improve- learningregion-8
Ventayen, R. M. (2018). Level of competency in computer systems servicing of teachers in one town in Northern Luzon (Unpublished master’s thesis). Pangasinan State University.
Vivekananda-Schmidt, P., Hassell, A. B., & McLean, M. (2004). Evaluation of multimedia learning packages in the education of health professionals. Nurse Researcher, 161–172.
Watts, N. (2007). A learner-based design model for interactive multimedia language learning packages.
ScienceDirect, 1–8.
Whelan, R. (2015). Instructional technology and theory: A look at past, present, and future trends. Prentice Hall.
Zulueta, F. (2004). Methods of research and applied statistics. National Bookstore.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
