Governance Technical Assistance and Compliance Readiness in Local Government Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22901507Keywords:
administrative capacity, compliance readiness, governance support, local government administration, technical assistance, regulatory complianceAbstract
This study assessed how governance technical assistance related to compliance readiness among local government personnel in Aurora, Isabela. Using a cross-sectional explanatory-predictive design, data were gathered from 30 personnel directly involved in governance compliance, program implementation, planning, monitoring, reporting, public safety, disaster preparedness, administrative coordination, and service delivery. The Governance Technical Assistance and Compliance Readiness Scale was used to measure policy and regulatory guidance, capability-building support, monitoring and feedback, implementation problem solving, regulatory awareness, documentary preparedness, interoffice coordination, and corrective-action responsiveness. Means and standard deviations described the levels of the major constructs, while Spearman’s rank-order correlation with 5,000 bias-corrected bootstrap resamples tested their association. Governance technical assistance obtained a high overall mean of 3.82, with policy and regulatory guidance emerging as the strongest dimension. Compliance readiness was likewise high at 3.72, led by regulatory awareness, while corrective-action responsiveness and interoffice coordination showed comparatively weaker results. Governance technical assistance was significantly and positively associated with compliance readiness, ρ = .57, p = .001, with a 95% bootstrap confidence interval of [0.25, 0.78]. The findings indicated that stronger technical support was linked with better preparedness to meet governance requirements, although gaps remained in problem resolution, cross-office coordination, documentary completion, and follow-through on corrective actions. The study underscored the value of targeted, sustained, and problem-responsive technical assistance in strengthening institutional compliance capacity within local government administration.
Downloads
References
Ateh, M. Y., Berman, E., & Prasojo, E. (2020). Intergovernmental strategies advancing performance management use. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(5), 993–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1736588
Bhusal, T. (2022). Understanding local government coordination: An assessment of district coordination committees in Nepal. State and Local Government Review, 54(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X221087909
De la Riva Agüero, R. (2022). Do cogovernance and CSOs supplement municipal capacity for service delivery? An assessment of differences in simple versus complex services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab026
Department of the Interior and Local Government Region IX. (2026). DILG IX retools Quality Procedure 23 to strengthen delivery of capacity development interventions.
Department of the Interior and Local Government Region XI. (2025). DILG XI-LGCDD conducts coaching on business-friendliness and competitiveness of LGUs based on 2024 SGLG results.
Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2026). DILG’s RIDS program steps up support for LGUs struggling to meet local governance standards. Department of the Interior and Local Government Region IV-A.
Diokno-Sicat, C. J., Adaro, C. E., Maddawin, R. B., Castillo, A. F. G., & Mariano, M. A. P. (2020). Baseline study on policy and governance gaps for the Local Government Support Fund Assistance to Municipalities (LGSF-AM) Program: Integrated report. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Distor, C. B., & Khaltar, O. (2022). What motivates local governments to be efficient? Evidence from Philippine cities. Sustainability, 14(15), 9426. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159426
Domorenok, E., Graziano, P., & Polverari, L. (2021). Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities: Evidence from EU cohesion policy. Policy and Society, 40(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1930697
Juco, M. N., Maddawin, R. B., Palomar, R. H. G., Ruiz, M. G. C., & Diokno-Sicat, C. J. (2024). Baseline study on the state of devolution in the (pre-Mandanas) Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/rps2024.07
Medina-Guce, C., & Sanders, R., Jr. (2024). Making sense of the Seal of Good Local Governance: Policy design layering and implications for shaping local government performance. Philippine Journal of Development, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.62986/pjd2024.48.1d
Nastase, A., Rajan, A., & French, B. (2021). Technical assistance: A practical account of the challenges in design and implementation. Gates Open Research, 4, 177. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13205.2
World Bank. (2021). Philippines: Mandanas ruling provides opportunities for improving service delivery through enhanced decentralization. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.