Teacher Adaptive Expertise, Classroom Decision-Making, and Learning Recovery Practices among Public Elementary School Teachers

Authors

  • Anna Marie C. Paragas Northeastern College Author
  • Anthony N. Ualat Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21054423

Keywords:

adaptive expertise, Bambang, classroom decision-making, elementary teachers, learning recovery, public schools

Abstract

This study located learning recovery within the professional judgment of public elementary school teachers by determining how teacher adaptive expertise and classroom decision-making shaped recovery-oriented instructional practices in Bambang, Nueva Vizcaya. Using a quantitative explanatory-predictive survey design, the study gathered data from public elementary school teachers through a validated researcher-developed questionnaire on teacher adaptive expertise, classroom decision-making, and learning recovery practices. The instrument demonstrated strong validity and reliability, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.95. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to determine the measurement quality, direct effects, indirect effects, and predictive relevance of the model. Results showed high levels of teacher adaptive expertise, classroom decision-making, and learning recovery practices. However, differentiated instruction, progress monitoring, learner grouping, and collaborative decision-making appeared as weaker areas that required further support. The structural model revealed that teacher adaptive expertise significantly predicted classroom decision-making and learning recovery practices, while classroom decision-making also significantly predicted learning recovery practices. Classroom decision-making partially mediated the relationship between teacher adaptive expertise and learning recovery practices, indicating that adaptive expertise became more meaningful when translated into evidence-based instructional decisions. The findings suggest that learning recovery may be strengthened through professional development focused on formative assessment use, learner progress tracking, differentiated recovery tasks, and collaborative analysis of learner needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banerjee, A., Banerji, R., Berry, J., Duflo, E., Kannan, H., Mukerji, S., Shotland, M., & Walton, M. (2017). From proof of concept to scalable policies: Challenges and solutions, with an application. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(4), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.4.73

Betthäuser, B. A., Bach-Mortensen, A. M., & Engzell, P. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01506-4

Bhagwandhin, V., Grudnoff, L., & Meyer, F. (2025). Classroom observations and post-observation conversations: Powerful tools for developing teacher adaptive expertise. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-025-00376-4

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

Bowers, N., Merritt, E. G., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2020). Exploring teacher adaptive expertise in the context of elementary school science reforms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1651613

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2

Department of Education. (2023). Adoption of the National Learning Recovery Program in the Department of Education (DepEd Order No. 013, s. 2023). Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.

Earle, S. (2021). Formative decision-making in response to primary science classroom assessment: What to do next? Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 584200. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.584200

Minea-Pic, A. (2023). Catching up on lost learning opportunities: Research and policy evidence on key learning recovery strategies (OECD Education Working Papers No. 292). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a69c5909-en

Moran, R. M. R., Robertson, L., Tai, C., Ward, N. A., & Price, J. (2023). Developing pre-service teachers’ adaptive expertise through STEM-CT integration in professional development and residency placements. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1267459. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1267459

Näsström, G., Andersson, C., Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). Changes in student motivation and teacher decision making when implementing a formative assessment practice. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 616216. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.616216

Seidel, T., Böheim, R., & Kosel, C. (2026). Developing a cognitive model of advanced teacher professional vision for understanding processes of noticing and reasoning. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1769094. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1769094

Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2021). What are the characteristics of effective teacher professional development? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education Endowment Foundation.

Suh, J. K., Hand, B., Ercan-Dursun, J., Sahin, E., & Fulmer, G. (2024). Exploring the complexity of adaptive teaching expertise within knowledge generation environments. Education Sciences, 14(4), Article 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040415

Tayem, A., & Bourgeois, I. (2024). Data-based decision making by teachers in K-12 schools: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 50(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28781

UNESCO. (2023). Education: From COVID-19 school closures to recovery. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

UNICEF, UNESCO, World Bank, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, United States Agency for International Development, & Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2022). Guide for learning recovery and acceleration: Using the RAPID Framework to address COVID-19 learning losses and build forward better. World Bank.

van der Steen, J., van Schilt-Mol, T., van der Vleuten, C., & Joosten-ten Brinke, D. (2022). Supporting teachers in improving formative decision-making: Design principles for formative assessment plans. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 925352. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.925352

World Bank, UNESCO, UNICEF, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, United States Agency for International Development, & Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Paragas, A. M., & Ualat, A. (2026). Teacher Adaptive Expertise, Classroom Decision-Making, and Learning Recovery Practices among Public Elementary School Teachers. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1570-1583. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21054423

Similar Articles

1-10 of 410

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.