Evaluation of DIBELS Assessment in the Literacy Development of Kindergarteners of Dagat-Dagatan Elementary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21337597Keywords:
DIBELS, early literacy assessment, educational evaluation, kindergarteners, literacy developmentAbstract
Background: Early literacy assessment is essential for identifying kindergarten learners who may be at risk for reading difficulties. Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) assessment in supporting the literacy development of kindergarteners at Dagat-Dagatan Elementary School. Methods: A mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative data were drawn from DIBELS pre- and post-assessment results involving 150 kindergarteners, while qualitative data were gathered from 10 kindergarten teachers and 20 parents through interviews, focus-group discussions, and feedback questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were used to analyze literacy gains, while thematic analysis was used to interpret stakeholder perceptions. Results: The baseline results showed varied literacy levels across phonemic awareness, alphabetic principle, accuracy, and fluency. Post-assessment results showed statistically significant improvement in all four domains, with p-values below 0.001. Teachers reported that DIBELS supported data-driven instruction and early intervention, while parents observed improved engagement in home reading activities. Challenges included time constraints, the need for additional teacher training, and requests for more regular parent updates. Conclusion: DIBELS is an effective early literacy assessment and monitoring tool for kindergarten learners when supported by teacher training, sufficient implementation time, and parent-school communication.
Downloads
References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Coyne, M. D., Kame’enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Harn, B. A. (2016). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (4th ed.). Pearson.
Fien, H., Smith, J. L. M., Smolkowski, K., Baker, S. K., Chaparro, E. A., Baker, D. L., & Otterstedt, J. (2015). Kindergarten predictors of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis of the DIBELS, AIMSweb, and MAP assessments. The Elementary School Journal, 116(2), 170-194. https://doi.org/10.1086/683984
Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., & Cummings, K. D. (2014). DIBELS Next technical manual (4th ed.). Dynamic Measurement Group. https://dibels.org/docs/techreports/DIBELSNext_Technical_Manual.pdf
Good, R. H., & Powell-Smith, K. A. (2015). DIBELS Next: Assessment manual. Dynamic Measurement Group.
Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2020). Curriculum-based measurement: Readiness for what? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12197
Kilpatrick, D. A. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing, and overcoming reading difficulties. Wiley.
McConnell, S., Bradfield, T., & Wackerle-Hollman, A. (2014). Use of technology to facilitate time-efficient early literacy assessment. NHSA Dialog, 17(3), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240754.2014.938681
Powell-Smith, K. A., Stoner, G., Shinn, M. R., & Good, R. H. (2015). The effects of curriculum-based measurement oral reading fluency on instructional decision-making: A literature review. Special Services in the Schools, 16(1-2), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v16n01_09
Seethaler, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2014). The predictive utility of kindergarten screening for math difficulty: Do kindergartners’ addition fluency and number combination fluency predict later math difficulty? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(3), 124-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12039
Stuart, M., & Stainthorp, R. (2016). Reading development and teaching. SAGE Publications.
University of Oregon Center on Teaching and Learning. (2018). DIBELS Next assessment manual. University of Oregon.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.