Land Titling Facilitation, Redocumentation Efficiency, and Service Completion Support in Agrarian Reform Implementation

Authors

  • Krizia Michelle A. Miranda Northeastern College Author
  • Michelle S. Morales Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21398612

Keywords:

agrarian reform implementation, land titling facilitation, quantile regression, redocumentation efficiency, service completion support, tenure security

Abstract

This study investigated how land titling facilitation and redocumentation efficiency shaped service completion support in agrarian reform implementation. A distribution-sensitive explanatory survey design was used among Department of Agrarian Reform personnel directly engaged in land documentation, title processing, records verification, and beneficiary assistance. Participants were selected through criterion-stratified systematic sampling. Data were gathered using a validated researcher-developed questionnaire with strong internal consistency coefficients ranging from .89 to .92. Descriptive statistics, quantile regression, and dominance analysis were employed. Results showed favorable assessments of land titling facilitation, redocumentation efficiency, and service completion support, with overall means of 3.76, 3.42, and 3.56, respectively. Procedural guidance, record accuracy, and beneficiary assistance emerged as notable strengths. However, transaction monitoring, document retrieval, processing continuity, and the resolution of administrative barriers remained areas of concern. Quantile regression revealed that both explanatory variables significantly predicted service completion support across the lower, median, and upper outcome levels. Redocumentation efficiency exerted the strongest influence under weaker service conditions, while land titling facilitation became more influential at higher levels of service completion. Dominance analysis identified redocumentation efficiency as the stronger overall predictor, accounting for 54.35 percent of the explained variation. The findings supported the establishment of integrated case tracking, standardized deficiency correction procedures, clearer processing responsibilities, regular records audits, and stronger interoffice coordination to improve the completion of land titling and related agrarian reform services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, D. A., Deininger, K., & Duponchel, M. (2017). New ways to assess and enhance land registry sustainability: Evidence from Rwanda. World Development, 99, 377–394. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.016

Alhola, S., & Gwaindepi, A. (2024). Land tenure formalisation and perceived tenure security: Two decades of the land administration project in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 143, Article 107195. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107195

Ballesteros, M. M., Ancheta, J., & Ramos, T. (2018). The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program after 30 years: Accomplishments and forward options (Research Paper Series No. 2018-03). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. doi:10.62986/rps2018.03

Burns, A. F., Rajabifard, A., & Shojaei, D. (2023). Undertaking land administration reform: Is there a better way? Land Use Policy, 132, Article 106824. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106824

Department of Agrarian Reform. (2021). Revised guidelines and procedures on the parcelization of landholdings with Collective Certificates of Land Ownership Award (Administrative Order No. 01, s. 2021).

Department of Agrarian Reform. (2024). 2024 revised rules and procedures on parcelization of landholdings with Collective Certificates of Land Ownership Award under the Support to Parcelization of Lands for Individual Titling Project (Administrative Order No. 02, s. 2024).

Department of Agrarian Reform, & Land Registration Authority. (2022). Registration and annotation requirements for Support to Parcelization of Land for Individual Titling and annotation of the conditions of the order of conversion (Joint DAR-LRA Administrative Order No. 02, s. 2022).

De la O Campos, A. P., Edouard, F., & Ruiz Salvago, M. (2023). Effects of land titling on household tenure security and investments: Evidence from Nicaragua. Land Use Policy, 126, Article 106547. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106547

Doss, C., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2020). Land tenure security for women: A conceptual framework. Land Use Policy, 99, Article 105080. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105080

Enemark, S., McLaren, R., & Lemmen, C. (2016). Fit-for-purpose land administration: Guiding principles for country implementation. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, & International Federation of Surveyors. (2022). Funding digital transformation of land administration: Investment brief. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. doi:10.4060/cc1880en

Galang, I. M. R. (2020). Boosting agricultural productivity through parcelization of Collective Certificate of Land Ownership Awards (Discussion Paper Series No. 2020-26). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. doi:10.62986/dp2020.26

Higgins, D., Balint, T., Liversage, H., & Winters, P. (2018). Investigating the impacts of increased rural land tenure security: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Rural Studies, 61, 34–62. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.05.001

Ho, S., Choudhury, P. R., & Joshi, R. (2023). Community participation for inclusive land administration: A case study of the Odisha urban slum formalization project. Land Use Policy, 125, Article 106457. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106457

Jadina, M. C., Nissen, S., & Rennie, H. (2025). The unfinished implications of ‘finished’ land reform: Local experiences of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program in Leyte, Philippines. Land Use Policy, 157, Article 107658. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107658

Republic Act No. 11953. (2023). An act emancipating agrarian reform beneficiaries from financial burden by condoning all principal loans, unpaid amortizations and interests and exempting payment of estate tax on agricultural lands awarded under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program [New Agrarian Emancipation Act].

World Bank. (2020). Support to Parcelization of Lands for Individual Titling Project (Project Appraisal Document, Report No. PAD3599; Project ID P172399).

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16

How to Cite

Miranda, K. M., & Morales, M. . (2026). Land Titling Facilitation, Redocumentation Efficiency, and Service Completion Support in Agrarian Reform Implementation. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(7), 854-868. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21398612

Similar Articles

41-50 of 475

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.