Leadership Governance and Institutional Service Excellence across Educational, Business, and Public Sector Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21695775Keywords:
accountability, institutional service excellence, leadership governance, organizational sectors, participatory decision-making, service recoveryAbstract
This study investigated how leadership governance influenced institutional service excellence across educational, business, and public sector organizations. It employed a cross-sector multilevel explanatory-predictive survey design involving 102 selected employees, supervisors, and administrators. Data were gathered using a validated researcher-developed questionnaire that demonstrated strong content validity and excellent internal consistency. Bayesian multilevel structural equation modeling was applied to estimate relationships at both individual and organizational levels while accounting for differences across sectors and organizational positions. Results showed that leadership governance and institutional service excellence were generally rated high. Ethical accountability, transparency, strategic direction, professionalism, and service reliability emerged as organizational strengths. However, participatory decision-making, adaptive leadership, responsiveness, and service recovery received comparatively lower assessments. Leadership governance showed a strong positive relationship with institutional service excellence, with the association appearing more pronounced at the organizational level. Sector-based comparisons revealed that business organizations obtained the highest estimates for governance and service excellence, while public sector organizations reported greater concerns related to responsiveness and service recovery. Administrators also provided more favorable assessments than employees and supervisors, indicating differences in how organizational practices were experienced across levels of responsibility. The findings demonstrated that service excellence depended not only on individual employee performance but also on governance systems that promoted accountability, communication, participation, adaptability, and coordinated problem resolution. Organizations were therefore encouraged to strengthen employee involvement, improve service recovery procedures, enhance interunit coordination, and implement sector-specific leadership development initiatives.
Downloads
References
Abdi, A. N. M., Hashi, M. B., & Latif, K. F. (2024). Ethical leadership and public sector performance: Mediating role of corporate social responsibility and organizational politics and moderator of social capital. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2386722. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2386722
Bagga, S. K., Gera, S., & Haque, S. N. (2023). The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.003
Blom, R., Kruyen, P. M., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & van Thiel, S. (2020). One HRM fits all? A meta-analysis of the effects of HRM practices in the public, semipublic, and private sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18773492
Brooks, J. S., & Brooks, M. C. (2024). Hot leadership, cool leadership: How education policies are implemented (and ignored) in schools. Educational Policy, 38(7), 1608–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048241268309
Deeod, P., & Kiettikunwong, N. (2026). Information disclosure, public trust, and social satisfaction as indicators of good governance and quality of life: Evidence from local administrative organizations in rural Thailand. Public Organization Review, 26, 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-026-00985-7
Domingo, S. N., Abrigo, M. R. M., Diokno-Sicat, C. J., Bernardo, P. U. S., Saquing, M. P. V., & Ocbina, J. J. S. (2022). Outcome evaluation of the Public Management Development Program (Discussion Paper Series No. 2022-50). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2022.50
Iddrisu, I., & Mohammed, B. (2024). Investigating the influence of employee voice on public sector performance: The mediating dynamics of organizational trust and culture. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 101096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101096
Jalilvand, M. A., Raeisi, A. R., & Shaarbafchizadeh, N. (2024). Hospital governance accountability structure: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 24, Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10135-0
Leitgöb, H., Seddig, D., Asparouhov, T., Behr, D., Davidov, E., De Roover, K., Jak, S., Meitinger, K., Menold, N., Muthén, B., Rudnev, M., Schmidt, P., & van de Schoot, R. (2023). Measurement invariance in the social sciences: Historical development, methodological challenges, state of the art, and future perspectives. Social Science Research, 110, Article 102805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102805
Li, F., Liu, B., Lin, W., Wei, X., & Xu, Z. (2021). How and when servant leadership promotes service innovation: A moderated mediation model. Tourism Management, 86, Article 104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104358
Lin, M., Ling, Q., Liu, Y., & Hu, R. (2021). The effects of service climate and internal service quality on frontline hotel employees’ service-oriented behaviors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 97, Article 102995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102995
Lo, Y.-C., Lu, C., Chang, Y.-P., & Wu, S.-F. (2024). Examining the influence of organizational commitment on service quality through the lens of job involvement as a mediator and emotional labor and organizational climate as moderators. Heliyon, 10(2), Article e24130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24130
Mincu, M. (2022). Why is school leadership key to transforming education? Structural and cultural assumptions for quality education in diverse contexts. Prospects, 52, 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09625-6
National Economic and Development Authority Regional Office II. (2023). Cagayan Valley Regional Development Plan 2023–2028. Regional Development Council II.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Government at a glance 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0efd0bcd-en
Rahmati, M. H., & Jalilvand, M. R. (2024). An optimal organizational excellence model for the public sector. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 41(3), 944–963. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2023-0098
Schwarz, G., Eva, N., & Newman, A. (2020). Can public leadership increase public service motivation and job performance? Public Administration Review, 80(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13182
Slåtten, T., Mutonyi, B. R., Nordli, A. J., & Lien, G. (2023). The role of ambidextrous leadership and employee ambidexterity in enhancing service quality of care and creativity: A study of health professionals. BMC Health Services Research, 23, Article 1252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10275-3
Taheri, T., Amerzadeh, M., Alizadeh, A., & Kalhor, R. (2025). The impact of good governance on organizational health with the mediating role of organizational accountability: Considering the influence of demographic and organizational variables. BMC Health Services Research, 25, Article 892. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12921-4
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2023). World public sector report 2023: Transforming institutions to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals after the pandemic. United Nations.
van Erp, S., & Browne, W. J. (2021). Bayesian multilevel structural equation modeling: An investigation into robust prior distributions for the doubly latent categorical model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(6), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1915146
Zia ud din, M., Yuan yuan, X., Ullah Khan, N., & Estay, C. (2024). The impact of public leadership on collaborative administration and public health delivery. BMC Health Services Research, 24, Article 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10537-0
Zyphur, M. J., Bonner, C. V., & Tay, L. (2023). Structural equation modeling in organizational research: The state of our science and some proposals for its future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041621-031401
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
