The Economic and Social Roles of Cooperatives in Strengthening Stakeholder Collaboration in San Pedro, Laguna

Authors

  • Ruby O. Adajar Graduate School-Open University System, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Sta. Mesa, Manila Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22291917

Keywords:

cooperatives, stakeholder collaboration, economic roles, social roles, collaborative governance, stakeholder value

Abstract

This study examined the economic and social roles of cooperatives in strengthening stakeholder collaboration and enhancing stakeholder value in San Pedro, Laguna. A convergent mixed-methods design combined a descriptive quantitative survey with qualitative key informant interviews. Seven registered transport, multipurpose, consumer, and credit cooperatives were purposively selected. The quantitative phase involved 384 stakeholders allocated proportionally from a combined cooperative population of 2,308 and sampled through stratified random procedures, while the qualitative phase involved purposively selected informants with direct knowledge of cooperative governance and partnership implementation. A structured survey questionnaire and semi-structured interview guide were used. The questionnaire was expert-reviewed, pilot-tested, and demonstrated excellent reliability, with dimension-level Cronbach alpha coefficients from .93 to .96 and an overall alpha of .97. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, weighted mean, and composite mean; interview data were analyzed thematically and integrated with the survey results. Cooperatives demonstrated a strong economic role (WM = 3.59), led by contribution to local economic stability (WM = 3.67), and a strong social role (WM = 3.45), led by trust building and social capital (WM = 3.50). Stakeholder collaboration and engagement were very high (WM = 3.69), with trust and mutual accountability highest (WM = 3.72). The effects of collaboration were also very high (WM = 3.70), particularly institutional and organizational effects (WM = 3.72). Qualitative findings identified challenges involving governance, communication, participation, trust, and resource capacity. The study concludes that cooperatives function as both economic enterprises and participatory social institutions. A multi-level improvement plan is proposed to strengthen inclusive governance, communication, participation, trust, capacity development, economic and social value, and institutional sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Birchall, J. (2014). The governance of large co-operative businesses. Co-operatives UK.

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238

Cooperative Development Authority. (2018). Revised guidelines on social audit of cooperatives (Memorandum Circular No. 2018-01). Cooperative Development Authority.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications (5th ed.).

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.

Hilario, V. (2022). Socio-economic impact of cooperatives among members: An input to customized program development framework for cooperatives. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(6).

International Co-operative Alliance. (n.d.). Co-operative identity, values and principles. International Co-operative Alliance. https://www.ica.coop/en/whats-co-op/co-operative-identity-values-principles

International Labour Organization. (2017). Cooperatives and the Sustainable Development Goals: A contribution to the post-2015 development debate. International Labour Organization.

International Labour Organization. (2023). Cooperatives in social development: Report of the United Nations Secretary-General. International Labour Organization.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications (5th ed.).

Overseas Cooperative Development Council. (2021). The impact of cooperatives on community and economic development. Overseas Cooperative Development Council.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications (4th ed.).

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Republic Act No. 9520. (2009). Philippine Cooperative Code of 2008. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2009/ra_9520_2009.html

Republic Act No. 11364. (2019). Cooperative Development Authority Charter of 2019. https://lawphil.net

Sarturi, G., Barakat, S. R., & Gomes, R. C. (2023). Stakeholder theory in the public sector domain: A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda.

Saz-Gil, I., Bretos, I., & Diaz-Foncea, M. (2021). Cooperatives and social capital. Sustainability, 13(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020534

Silverman, D. (2020). Qualitative research. Sage Publications (5th ed.).

United Nations General Assembly. (2023). Cooperatives in social development: Report of the Secretary-General. United Nations.

Zeuli, K. A., & Cropp, R. (2004). Cooperatives: Principles and practices in the 21st century. University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-04

How to Cite

Adajar, R. (2026). The Economic and Social Roles of Cooperatives in Strengthening Stakeholder Collaboration in San Pedro, Laguna. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(9), 218-228. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22291917

Similar Articles

1-10 of 438

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.