GPS-Guided Focal-Point Identification and Hydraulic Optimization of a Submersible Floating-Waste Collector in Matab-Ang River, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22334480Keywords:
riverine floating waste, GPS drifter, focal-point identification, debris interception, computational fluid dynamics, hydraulic optimization, environmental engineering, Matab-ang RiverAbstract
Floating solid waste in rivers is transported by spatially variable surface flows, making collector placement a critical design decision. This study developed a low-cost GPS-based floating profiler to identify probable waste-transport focal points in Matab-ang River, Talisay City, Philippines, and evaluated a hydraulically modified inner basket for a submersible floating-waste collector. A 3D-printed polylactic acid enclosure containing a GPS tracking module was deployed through 31 trials in each of three river sections. Trajectory frequency was analyzed using a gridded spatial framework. Four focal cells were identified: E11 in the left section (25/31 trajectories; 80.65%), H5 and I4 in the middle section (19/31 each; 61.29%), and N6 in the right section (22/31; 70.97%). The collector was evaluated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and controlled physical testing. Three basket geometries were considered in the CFD comparison: straight, varying-diameter, and varying-diameter with a bell-shaped inlet. The latter produced the highest average simulated velocity (0.4859 m/s), compared with 0.3914 m/s for the straight geometry. In 30 physical trials per configuration, mean intake velocity increased from 0.14799 to 0.19769 ft/s, equivalent to a 33.5% improvement. A two-sample t-test assuming unequal variances indicated a statistically significant difference between the designs (t = −26.41, df = 49, p < 0.001). Average turbulent kinetic energy increased from 0.001443 to 0.002196 m²/s² in the CFD results. The findings support a combined trajectory-mapping and hydraulic-optimization framework for targeted river-waste interception. However, the study does not yet establish long-term field capture capacity because physical intake tests used a standardized floating object in a controlled pool environment and GPS deployment was limited primarily to low-tide conditions.
Downloads
References
Lane, S. N. (2017). Natural flood management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 4(3), Article e1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1211
Lane, S. N., & Richards, K. S. (1997). Linking river channel form and process: Time, space and causality revisited. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 22(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199703)22:3<249::AID-ESP736>3.0.CO;2-H
Rinaldi, M., Casagli, N., & Dapporto, S. (1999). Monitoring and assessing river bank erosion processes. Geomorphology, 31(3–4), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00028-2
Shahrubudin, N., Lee, T. C., & Ramlan, R. (2019). An overview on 3D printing technology: Technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manufacturing, 35, 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089
Sharma, S. K., Tiwari, K. N., & Goyal, R. K. (2017). Application of GPS in hydrology: A review. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 45(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-016-0583-2
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.