Professional Development Needs, Participation Barriers, And Self-Perceived Instructional Competence of Teachers in Pamaypayan Integrated School, Bislig City Division: A Descriptive-Survey Approach as Basis for a School-Based In-Service Training Plan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22690036Keywords:
professional development needs, participation barriers, instructional competence, teacher professional development, school-based INSET, remote integrated schoolAbstract
This study determined the professional development needs, participation barriers, and self-perceived instructional competence of teachers in Pamaypayan Integrated School, Bislig City Division, as basis for a School-Based In-Service Training (INSET) Plan. A quantitative cross-sectional descriptive-survey design was employed. Total enumeration was attempted among all 21 eligible teachers, of whom 19 returned complete and usable questionnaires, yielding a 90.48% response rate. Data were gathered through a researcher-developed and expert-reviewed questionnaire aligned with Teaching and Learning International Survey domains for professional development needs and participation barriers and with Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale domains for instructional competence. Frequency and percentage described respondent profiles, while weighted mean, standard deviation, and rank ordering summarized the major variables. Teachers reported a High Need for professional development overall (M = 3.71, SD = 0.71), with Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration highest (M = 3.99). Participation barriers were Moderate overall (M = 3.18, SD = 0.82), led by distance/transportation (M = 4.11) and limited internet/connectivity (M = 3.42), both interpreted as Major Barriers. Self-perceived instructional competence was Confident overall (M = 3.85, SD = 0.48); Classroom Management ranked highest (M = 3.96), while Student Engagement was comparatively lowest (M = 3.72). The findings support a developmental rather than remedial INSET plan emphasizing collaboration, inclusive and differentiated instruction, learner engagement, assessment, contextualized resources, and school-based, offline-capable delivery responsive to the school’s remote setting.
This study determined the professional development needs, participation barriers, and self-perceived instructional competence of teachers in Pamaypayan Integrated School, Bislig City Division, as basis for a School-Based In-Service Training (INSET) Plan. A quantitative cross-sectional descriptive-survey design was employed. Total enumeration was attempted among all 21 eligible teachers, of whom 19 returned complete and usable questionnaires, yielding a 90.48% response rate. Data were gathered through a researcher-developed and expert-reviewed questionnaire aligned with Teaching and Learning International Survey domains for professional development needs and participation barriers and with Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale domains for instructional competence. Frequency and percentage described respondent profiles, while weighted mean, standard deviation, and rank ordering summarized the major variables. Teachers reported a High Need for professional development overall (M = 3.71, SD = 0.71), with Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration highest (M = 3.99). Participation barriers were Moderate overall (M = 3.18, SD = 0.82), led by distance/transportation (M = 4.11) and limited internet/connectivity (M = 3.42), both interpreted as Major Barriers. Self-perceived instructional competence was Confident overall (M = 3.85, SD = 0.48); Classroom Management ranked highest (M = 3.96), while Student Engagement was comparatively lowest (M = 3.72). The findings support a developmental rather than remedial INSET plan emphasizing collaboration, inclusive and differentiated instruction, learner engagement, assessment, contextualized resources, and school-based, offline-capable delivery responsive to the school’s remote setting.
Downloads
References
Andal-Saniano, A. C., Marquez, M. K. I., & Medina, H. M. R. (2024). How to conduct and write a cross-sectional study. The Filipino Family Physician, 62(1), 31–40. https://thepafp.org/journal/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/PAFP-Journal-62-1_31-40.pdf
ASEAN Secretariat. (2025). ASEAN teacher professional development and mobility (ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Trend Report No. 15). https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ASCC-RD_Trend-Report_FoE-15_2025_ASEAN-Teacher-Professional-Development-and-Mobility.pdf
Bantoc, A. A., & Yazon, A. D. (2023). Self-efficacy, core behavioral competence and performance of teachers: A scaffold for proficient and highly proficient teachers. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(12), 4530–4555. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.12.28
Cabunoc, C. F. L., & Ubayubay, R. M. (2024). Competency and barriers in using ICT among public school teachers in Tagoloan District. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(8), 3747–3761. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i08-14
Chin, J. M.-C., Ching, G. S., del Castillo, F., Wen, T.-H., Huang, Y.-C., del Castillo, C. D., Gungon, J. L., & Trajera, S. M. (2022). Perspectives on the barriers to and needs of teachers’ professional development in the Philippines during COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(1), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010470
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/research-design/book270550
Department of Education. (2021, March 20). INSET 2021 reaches over 260k participants on Day 1. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2021/03/20/inset-2021-reaches-over-260k-participants-on-day-1/
Duan, S., Bissaker, K., & Xu, Z. (2024). Correlates of teachers’ classroom management self-efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09881-2
Entegro, E. A. E. (2022). Impact of virtual training on the Filipino secondary school teachers’ sense of efficacy in student engagement, instructional strategies, and classroom management. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 110–126. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.103008
Francia, M. C. (2025). Administrators’ instructional leadership practices and teachers’ pedagogical competence among the public elementary schools of Bislig City Division. TWIST, 20(3), 285–297. https://twistjournal.net/twist/article/download/842/539/1653
Gálvez-Nieto, J. L., Salvo-Garrido, S., Domínguez-Lara, S., Polanco-Levicán, K., & Mieres-Chacaltana, M. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale in a sample of Chilean public school teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1272548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272548
Koo, M. (2025). Likert-type scale. Encyclopedia, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010018
Liu, S., Wang, Y., & Yin, H. (2025). A meta-analysis of the correlation between professional learning communities and teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Educational Research Review, 46, 100660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100660
Macapodi, N., & Labitad, G. (2025). Implementation of school-based learning action cell on teaching and learning practices. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 4(2), 44–73. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v4i2.4177
Madadizadeh, F., & Bahariniya, S. (2025). Tutorial on internal consistency assessment by Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 41, 100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100568
Masongsong, J. M., Lopres, J. R., Aguirre, M. M., Lopres, G. M., Enriquez, D. M., Bautista, F. B., Niadas, G. Y., & Virtusio, J. D. T. (2023). Level of teachers’ training in inclusive education and their sense of efficacy. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 6(5), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i5p108
Morina, F., Fütterer, T., Hübner, N., Zitzmann, S., & Fischer, C. (2025). Effects of online teacher professional development on teacher-, classroom-, and student-level outcomes: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 228, 105247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105247
Navarro, A. M. (2024). School infrastructure in the Philippines: Where are we now and where should we be heading? (PIDS Research Paper Series No. 2024-06). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/document/pidsrp2406.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
Padohinog, E. C., Liwanag, B. A., & Balsicas, N. W. (2024). Teacher self-efficacy through achievement goals, instructional strategies, and student engagement in the Philippine setting. Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.56278/apherj.v11i1.2618
Pantao, L. G. (2024). The interplay of teachers’ profile, workload and self-efficacy: A correlational study. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100025
Rivera, J. P. R., Sinsay-Villanueva, L. M. V., Tanyag, I. H., Berroya, J. D., Garcia, G. D. V., & Lim, V. L. (2025). Revitalizing the Philippine education system: Facilitating access and participation to in-service training (INSET) and teacher professional development (TPD) (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2025-14). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/document/pidsdps2514.pdf
Rodriguez, R. D. (2025). Out-of-field teaching in rural senior high schools: Prevalence, challenges, support, and impact on job satisfaction. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 35(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.350104
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/nl/en_NL/higher-education/subject-catalogue/business-and-management/saunders-research-methods-for-business-students-9ed.html
Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Goodrich, J., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2022). Effective teacher professional development: New theory and a meta-analytic test (EdWorkingPaper No. 22-507). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/rzet-bf74
UNESCO & International Task Force on Teachers for Education 2030. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. UNESCO. https://teachertaskforce.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/2349-23_GlobalReportonTeacher_WEB.pdf
United Nations Statistics Division. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals report 2021: Extended report—Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/extended-report/Goal%20%284%29_final.pdf
Wafudu, S. J., Kamin, Y. B., & Marcel, D. (2022). Validity and reliability of a questionnaire developed to explore quality assurance components for teaching and learning in vocational and technical education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, Article 303. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01306-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.