Contextualized Science Learning Tasks and Conceptual Transfer in Secondary Classrooms

Authors

  • Daisy R. Gulingan Northeastern College Author
  • Genesis N. Damaso Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22931496

Keywords:

conceptual transfer, contextualized learning, grade 10 learners, science education, secondary classrooms, transfer tasks

Abstract

This study investigated how contextualized science learning tasks supported conceptual transfer among Grade 10 learners in a public secondary school in Tabuk City, Kalinga. Using a matched-intact-class delayed-transfer design, 60 learners were assigned by class to contextualized-task and comparison conditions. Data were gathered through the Contextualized Science Learning Tasks Scale and the Contextualized Science Learning and Conceptual Transfer Assessment, which measured near, intermediate, and far transfer across baseline, immediate, and delayed assessments. Results showed that learners rated the contextualized tasks positively, with local and experiential relevance obtaining the highest mean, while cross-context task variation received the lowest. Despite this, cross-context task variation showed the strongest association with delayed conceptual transfer. Learners exposed to contextualized tasks demonstrated greater gains than the comparison group from baseline to immediate assessment and maintained a substantial advantage after two weeks. Mixed-effects analysis confirmed significant condition-by-time interactions for overall transfer and across near, intermediate, and far transfer levels. Far transfer remained the most difficult, indicating that learners continued to struggle when new problems differed substantially from instructional examples. The findings suggest that contextualized science learning is most effective when familiar situations are combined with inquiry, reflection, and progressively varied applications. Secondary Science instruction should therefore move beyond relevance alone and provide repeated opportunities for learners to apply scientific concepts across changing situations to strengthen durable and flexible understanding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chase, C. C., Malkiewich, L., & Kumar, A. S. (2019). Learning to notice science concepts in engineering activities and transfer situations. Science Education, 103(2), 440–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21496

Department of Education. (2016). The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 Basic Education Program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning (DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016).

Department of Education. (2024). Allocation list for selected recipient schools [Annex B]. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.

Kaminske, A. N., Kuepper-Tetzel, C. E., Nebel, C. L., Sumeracki, M. A., & Ryan, S. P. (2020). Transfer: A review for biology and the life sciences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 19(3), es9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0227

Khishfe, R. (2019). The transfer of nature of science understandings: A question of similarity and familiarity of contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9), 1159–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1596329

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Philippines country note. OECD Publishing.

Penuel, W. R., Turner, M. L., Jacobs, J. K., Van Horne, K., & Sumner, T. (2019). Developing tasks to assess phenomenon-based science learning: Challenges and lessons learned from building proximal transfer tasks. Science Education, 103(6), 1367–1395. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21544

Picardal, M. T., & Sanchez, J. M. P. (2022). Effectiveness of contextualization in science instruction to enhance science literacy in the Philippines: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.9

Podschuweit, S., & Bernholt, S. (2018). Composition-effects of context-based learning opportunities on students' understanding of energy. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 717–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9585-z

Sevian, H., Dori, Y. J., & Parchmann, I. (2018). How does STEM context-based learning work: What we know and what we still do not know. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470346

Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329

Downloads

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Gulingan, D., & Damaso, G. (2026). Contextualized Science Learning Tasks and Conceptual Transfer in Secondary Classrooms. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(9), 1870-1878. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22931496

Similar Articles

51-60 of 776

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.