Constructivist English Class: Practices in the Teaching of Language

Authors

  • Elisa Q. Pardines Rizal Technological University, Mandaluyong City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23142384

Keywords:

constructivism, English language teaching, classroom practices, teacher perceptions, student-centered learning, focus group discussion

Abstract

This study explored senior high school English teachers’ perspectives and classroom practices regarding Constructivist Learning Theory and examined how these practices aligned with constructivist principles in language instruction. A qualitative descriptive design was employed using focus group discussions with 16 purposively selected English teachers from four public senior high schools in the Division of Imus City, Cavite, with four participants from each school. Data were gathered through an expert-validated open-ended interview guide consisting of probe and exit questions. Focus group sessions were conducted online and in person, audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed through open coding, categorization, and thematic analysis, with respondent checking and expert validation used to strengthen credibility. Findings showed that teachers understood constructivism through five interconnected perspectives: student-centered learning, discovery learning, teacher-facilitated learning experiences, scaffolding-schema approaches, and connections to real-life experiences. These perspectives were reflected in practices such as group defense, position paper writing, mock interviews, extemporaneous speaking, role-playing, use of realia, translanguaging, symbolism, and video or film analysis, although implementation varied across schools. Misconceptions were also identified, particularly the beliefs that constructivism is purely discovery-based, minimizes or removes the teacher’s role, overlooks sociocultural differences, or produces inconsistent outcomes. Based on these findings, constructivist-aligned classroom strategies were proposed to strengthen guided facilitation, reflection, authentic communication, cultural responsiveness, and structured assessment. The study underscores the need for sustained professional development and coherent support for context-sensitive constructivist English instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, A. (2021). Implementation of constructivist approach in teaching English grammar in primary schools. Elementary Education Online, 2803–2813.

Allen, A. (2022). An introduction to constructivism: Its theoretical roots and impact on contemporary education. Journal of Learning Design and Leadership, 1(1), 1–11.

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017

Brau, B. (2020). Constructivism. In R. Kimmons & S. Caskurlu (Eds.), The students’ guide to learning design and research (pp. 33–43).

Can, T. (2019). Learning and teaching languages online: A constructivist approach. ResearchGate, 26–33.

Castro, M., & Santos, J. (2020). The use of constructivism and its impact on students’ language satisfaction in language learning. SSRN, 6–21.

Chuang, H., & Muttaqin, S. (2022). Variables affecting English-medium instruction students’ achievement: Results of a multiple regression analysis. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 13–28.

Dilekli, Y. (2018). The relationship among teachers’ classroom practices for teaching thinking skills, teachers’ self-efficacy towards teaching thinking skills and teachers’ teaching styles. Elsevier, 144–151.

Gordon, M. (2018). The misuses and effective uses of constructivist teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 737–746.

Gray, A. (2018). Constructivist teaching and learning. School Boards.

Gul, A. (2022, June 14). Constructivist methods in teaching English as a second language (ESL). Modern Diplomacy.

Haynor, M. I. (2018). Applying a constructivist approach to the assessment of compositions in a secondary technology-based music classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University). ProQuest LLC. ERIC Document No. ED584533.

Jain, H. (2023, February 28). Constructive approach to language teaching. Prep With Harshita.

Jones, M. (2018). The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning. American Communication Journal, 19–28.

Kim, J. (2018). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7–19.

Lovat, T., & Toomey, R. (2009). Values education and quality teaching: The double helix effect. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9962-5

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.

Minshar, M. A. (2020). The effect of using educational games on third-grade students’ achievement of English vocabulary in the Hebron Governorate. Psychological and Educational Studies Journal, 13(3), 309–319.

Mocon-Ciriaco, C. (2019, December 5). DepEd vows to improve quality of education after PISA showing. BusinessMirror.

Nucci, L. P., & Narvaez, D. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of moral and character education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887127

Office of Curriculum, Assessment and Teaching Transformation. (2021). Constructivism. University at Buffalo.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking Press.

Poonam, & Sharma, H. L. (2018). Constructivist approach for teaching English: Making sense of paradigm shift from the traditional approach. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(10), 788–792.

Shah, R. (2019). Effective constructivist teaching learning in the classroom. International Journal of Education, 1–13.

Triantafyllou, S. A. (2022). Constructivist learning environments. DPublication.

Western Governors University. (2020, May 27). What is constructivism?

Zu, B. (2022). Oxford’s Strategy Inventory for Language Learning: English learning of Chinese students in a Thai university. LEARN Journal: Language Education & Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 705–723.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-04

How to Cite

Pardines, E. (2026). Constructivist English Class: Practices in the Teaching of Language. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(10), 278-287. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23142384

Similar Articles

1-10 of 945

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.