Simulator-Limb Training in Phlebotomy among Health Science Students: Implications for Technique-Related Preanalytical Errors—A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23765360Keywords:
simulation training, phlebotomy, preanalytical error, health science studentsAbstract
Introduction: Phlebotomy is an essential skill that health science students need to develop for future clinical practice. Proper phlebotomy technique can help prevent technique-related preanalytical errors that may compromise specimen quality and patient safety. Simulator-limb training gives students opportunities to practice venipuncture in a controlled environment before performing procedures on actual patients. This study examined the effectiveness of simulator-based limb training in phlebotomy and its potential to minimize technique-related preanalytical specimen errors. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines to examine simulator limb training in phlebotomy among health science students and its implications for technique-related preanalytical specimen errors. Google Scholar, PubMed, and EBSCOhost were searched for English-language studies published from January 2016 to September 2026. Eligible studies evaluated simulator-limb training in phlebotomy among health science students and reported outcomes related to procedural competency or preanalytical specimen errors. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Due to heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and outcome measures, the findings were synthesized narratively and organized into three themes: clinical competency and learner readiness; safe, repetitive, and experiential learning; and implications for patient safety and the prevention of technique-related preanalytical errors. Results and Discussion: The reviewed literature showed that simulator-limb phlebotomy training improved venipuncture competency, confidence, and psychomotor skills while providing a safe environment for repetitive practice, error recognition, and feedback. However, no included studies directly measured the potential effect on reducing technique-related preanalytical specimen error rates before and after simulator-limb training; improved procedural competency and consistent phlebotomy performance may contribute to specimen quality and patient safety. Lastly, challenges include equipment and maintenance costs, limited funding, faculty training, curriculum integration, and limited clinical authenticity in integrating simulator-limb training for health science students practicing phlebotomy. Conclusion: Simulator-limb training may complement phlebotomy competency development among health science students. Further research directly measuring preanalytical errors and specimen rejection rates is needed to establish its effectiveness in reducing technique-related preanalytical errors.
Downloads
References
Ahn, E., & Kang, H. (2018). Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 71(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.103
Basavarajegowda, A., Pai, D. R., & Nalini, Y. C. (2024). Simulation in the field of transfusion medicine: Scope and utility. Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, 18(1), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_109_22
Bienstock, J., & Heuer, A. (2022). A review on the evolution of simulation-based training to help build a safer future. Medicine, 101(25), Article e29503. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029503
Dziri, C., Amara, I., Rhouma, M. B., & Cheikh, M. B. (2024). Low fidelity simulation versus standardized patient for teaching peripheral venous cannulation for nursing students: A crossover randomized trial. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 19(2), e420–e426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.01.007
Dzhumatovich, A. S., & Salimrouhi, E. (2025). Simulation-based education as a tool for enhancing the quality of medical education. Journal of Preventive and Complementary Medicine, 4(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpcm.2025.511432.1214
Erdmann, T. R., & Oliveira Filho, G. R. (2018). Low-fidelity haptic simulation increases the transfer of peripheral blood sampling skills in novice medical students. MedEdPublish, 7, Article 145. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000145.1
Hernon, O., McSharry, E., Simpkin, A. J., MacLaren, I., & Carr, P. J. (2024). Evaluating nursing students' venipuncture and peripheral intravenous cannulation knowledge, attitude, and performance: A two-phase evaluation study. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 47(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000539
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
Hsieh, S. S., Hwang, G. J., Sung, Y. K., & Huang, H. (2026). Effects of an embodied cognitive learning-based inductive venipuncture arm simulator on nursing internship trainees’ learning achievement, motivation, self-efficacy, and anxiety. BMC Medical Education, 26, Article 1680. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10000-8
Khan, M., Amin, S., Saleem, S., Gul, N., Akhwand, M., & Maryam, M. (2026). Simulation-based training vs bedside teaching in skill acquisition in medical education. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Technology, 16(1), 2069–2073. https://www.ijprt.org/index.php/pub/article/view/1826
Kodikara, K., Seneviratne, T., & Premaratna, R. (2023). Pre-clerkship procedural training in venipuncture: A prospective cohort study on skills acquisition and durability. BMC Medical Education, 23, Article 729. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04722-2
Naseem, S., Hassan, B., Manzoor, S., Khan, F. M., Mahrukh, & Idrees, N. (2026). Comparison of simulation-based training and bedside teaching in enhancing clinical skill acquisition among medical students. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Technology, 16(1), 2107–2112. https://www.ijprt.org/index.php/pub/article/view/1838
Naz, S., Mumtaz, A., & Sadaruddin, A. (2012). Preanalytical errors and their impact on tests in clinical laboratory practice. Pakistan Journal of Medical Research, 51(1), 27–30. https://applications.emro.who.int/imemrf/Pak_J_Med_Res/Pak_J_Med_Res_2012_51_1_27_30.pdf
Nordin, N., Ab Rahim, S., Wan Omar, W., et al. (2024). Preanalytical errors in clinical laboratory testing at a glance: Source and control measures. Cureus, 16(3), Article e57243. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57243
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
Saengpayab, Y., Kongsri, W., Chongsereecharoen, E., Pratummasoot, N., Akkarapattanapong, V., & Jarintanan, F. (2021). Venipuncture training assists using electrical sensors in a rubber arm system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1719(1), Article 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1719/1/012025
Sneha, K., Supreetha, M. S., & Hemalatha, A. (2026). Educational evaluation of a value-added course on phlebotomy among BSc Medical Laboratory Technology students. Perspectives in Medical Research, 14(2), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1402.26.43
Tserovski, S., Papadakis, K., Yanev, K. K., Mileva-Popova, R. D., & Bogdanov, T. G. (2026). Design, manufacturing, and educational evaluation of a low-cost venipuncture training simulator. Cureus, 18(4), Article e106831. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.106831
Walker, S. E., & Thrasher, A. B. (2013). Use of simulation to develop clinical skills: Part 1, low-fidelity simulators. International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training, 18(2), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijatt.18.2.20
Warekois, R. S., & Robinson, R. (2016). Phlebotomy: Worktext and procedures manual (4th ed.). Elsevier.
World Health Organization. (2010). WHO guidelines on drawing blood: Best practices in phlebotomy. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44294
Yadav, B., & Yadav, S. (2025). Simulation-based education in healthcare: A comprehensive review. Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Care, 12(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJHSC.IJHSC_11_25
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
