Public Transport Systems and Policies and Programs of the Department of Transportation (DOTr): Basis of an Enhanced Re-Engineering Program

Authors

  • Keiven M. Marcelo Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science and Technology Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23766813

Keywords:

jeepney re-engineering, public utility vehicle modernization, transport policy, stakeholder perceptions, just transition, Metro Manila

Abstract

This study assessed public transport policies and programs of the Department of Transportation (DOTr) as the basis for an enhanced jeepney re-engineering program in the northern National Capital Region of the Philippines. The descriptive, predominantly quantitative survey involved 350 respondents from Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, and Valenzuela: 300 commuters, 25 jeepney drivers, and 25 operators. A structured five-part questionnaire collected ratings on safety, comfort, affordability, emissions, livelihood, mobility, satisfaction, equity, implementation challenges, and proposed measures. The study used weighted means, analysis of variance, and Pearson product–moment correlation. Respondents generally agreed with the perceived benefits of existing policies (overall means of 3.10–3.16 across four dimensions) and programs (composite means of 3.02–3.10 across five dimensions). Group assessments differed significantly for policy affordability (F = 4.521) and for four program-benefit dimensions (F = 5.110–10.502), but not for policy safety, comfort, or emissions or program livelihood support. Policy and program perceptions showed a moderate positive relationship (r = .4201, p = .0012). The overall seriousness of implementation challenges was rated 3.28, with modernization costs (3.46) and perceived disadvantage of small operators (3.37) ranking highest. Respondents highly recommended financial assistance, transparent consultation, and capacity building. Based on these perceptions, the study proposed the Policy for Advancing Sustainable and Accountable Drivers and Automotive Modernization Outcomes (PASADAMO). The findings support a stakeholder-sensitive modernization approach; neither technical retrofitting performance nor the proposed policy’s implementation effects were evaluated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2023). Transportation statistics annual report 2023. U.S. Department of Transportation. https://doi.org/10.21949/1529944

Ceder, A. (2015). Public transit planning and operation: Modeling, practice and behavior (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

de Oña, J., de Oña, R., Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2013). Perceived service quality in bus transit service: A structural equation approach. Transport Policy, 29, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.001

Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2007). Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 10(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.10.3.2

Federal Transit Administration. (2024). National public transportation safety plan. U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.transit.dot.gov/

Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board. (2018). Guidelines for the public utility vehicle modernization program’s initial implementation pursuant to Department Order No. 2017-11 (Memorandum Circular No. 2018-006). https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/90045

Litman, T. (2022). Evaluating transportation equity: Guidance for incorporating distributional impacts in transport planning. ITE Journal, 92(4). https://vtpi.org/Litman_ITEJ_Equity_Apr2022.pdf

Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Government at a glance 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en

Republic Act No. 11285. (2019). Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act. Republic of the Philippines. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2019/ra_11285_2019.html

Republic Act No. 4136. (1964). Land transportation and traffic code. Republic of the Philippines. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1964/ra_4136_1964.html

Republic Act No. 7277. (1992). Magna Carta for Disabled Persons. Republic of the Philippines. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1992/ra_7277_1992.html

Republic Act No. 8749. (1999). Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999. Republic of the Philippines. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1999/ra_8749_1999.html

Republic Act No. 9442. (2007). An act amending Republic Act No. 7277, otherwise known as the Magna Carta for Disabled Persons, and for other purposes. Republic of the Philippines. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2007/ra_9442_2007.html

Tirachini, A. (2020). Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: An international review. Transportation, 47, 2011–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10070-2

United Nations. (2023). World social report 2023: Leaving no one behind in an ageing world. United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Marcelo, K. (2026). Public Transport Systems and Policies and Programs of the Department of Transportation (DOTr): Basis of an Enhanced Re-Engineering Program. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(10), 2346-2354. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23766813

Similar Articles

1-10 of 591

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.