Differences in Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) Reading Comprehension Scores Between Heavy and Light Smartphone Users Among Junior High School Students of Dinuyan Integrated School, Division of Surigao Del Sur: A Causal-Comparative Quantitative Study

Authors

  • Rico L. Orillaneda Graduate School, Andres Soriano Colleges of Bislig, Mangagoy, Bislig City, Surigao del Sur, Philippines Author
  • Anrey G. Antiquina Graduate School, Andres Soriano Colleges of Bislig, Mangagoy, Bislig City, Surigao del Sur, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24030824

Keywords:

Phil-IRI, reading comprehension, problematic smartphone use, SAS-SV, junior high school learners, causal-comparative design

Abstract

This study determined whether Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) English reading comprehension performance differed between heavy and light smartphone users among junior high school learners of Dinuyan Integrated School, Division of Surigao del Sur, and used the findings as the basis for a proposed intervention program. A causal-comparative quantitative design was employed, comparing two naturally occurring groups without manipulating the independent variable. Through total enumeration, all 200 Grades 7 to 10 learners served as respondents. Smartphone use level was measured using the Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version (SAS-SV) and classified as light or heavy using sex-specific cut-off scores, while beginning-of-school-year Phil-IRI (English) reading comprehension levels (Independent, Instructional, and Frustration) were retrieved from official school records. Data were analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, the chi-square test of independence, and Cramer’s V. Results showed that 55.0% of the learners were at the Frustration level, 34.0% at the Instructional level, and only 11.0% at the independent level, while 59.0% were classified as heavy smartphone users. Heavy users were markedly more concentrated at the Frustration level (66.9%) than light users (37.8%), and smartphone use classification was significantly associated with reading comprehension level, χ² (2, N = 200) = 18.20, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .30, indicating a moderate association. The study concludes that reading comprehension difficulty is substantial among the learners and that heavy smartphone users display a significantly less favorable reading profile, although the non-experimental design does not establish direct causation. These findings support a school-based reading and digital balance intervention that integrates reading remediation, comprehension development, responsible smartphone-use routines, home–school support, and progress monitoring.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abril, J. G., Acerbo, C. T., & Abocejo, F. T. (2022). The Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) program: A critical analysis. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 5(4), 432–441. https://bircu-journal.com/index.php/birle/article/view/7270

Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2025). Do new forms of reading pay off? A meta-analysis on the relationship between leisure digital reading habits and text comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 95(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231216463

Amaranto, S. M. E., & Dioso, E. D. (2025). Electronic gadgets usage on the reading comprehension skill in Filipino. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(8). https://cognizancejournal.com/vol5issue8/V5I801.pdf

Bhandari, P. (2020, June 12). What is quantitative research? Definition, uses and methods. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/

Buctot, D. B., Kim, N., & Kim, S. H. (2020). The role of nomophobia and smartphone addiction in the lifestyle profiles of junior and senior high school students in the Philippines. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), Article 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100035

Cantery, A. L. (2022). The impact of the Reading Engagement Advocacy and Development (READ) program in the new normal. Department of Education Region IX, E-Saliksik: DepEd Research Portal. https://e-saliksik.deped.gov.ph/the-impact-of-the-reading-engagement-advocacy-and-development-read-program-in-the-new-normal/

Çelikkalp, Ü., Bilgiç, Ş., Temel, M., & Varol, G. (2020). The smartphone addiction levels and the association with communication skills in nursing and medical school students. Journal of Nursing Research, 28(3), Article e93. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000370

Common Sense Media. (2023). Constant companion: A week in the life of a young person’s smartphone use. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/constant-companion-a-week-in-the-life-of-a-young-persons-smartphone-use

Department of Education. (2024). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) test (DepEd Order No. 009, s. 2024). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2024_009.pdf

Department of Education Region VIII. (2024). DepEd Region VIII research bulletin (Vol. 6, No. 2). https://region8.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Q2-RB_24.pdf

Feng, X., Ren, S., & Shi, P. (2025). The relationship and mechanism of screen time and academic performance among adolescents: An empirical study based on CEPS. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article 1533327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1533327

Grand Canyon University. (2023, April 28). Types of quantitative research methods and designs. https://www.gcu.edu/blog/doctoral-journey/types-quantitative-research-methods-designs

Hidalgo-Fuentes, S., Martínez-Álvarez, I., Llamas-Salguero, F., Pineda-Zelaya, I. S., Merino-Soto, C., & Chans, G. M. (2025). Psychometric properties of the Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version (SAS-SV) in Honduran university students. PLOS ONE, 20(7), Article e0327226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327226

Hoover, W. A. (2024). The simple view of reading and its broad types of reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 37(9), 2277–2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10471-x

Huey, M., & Giguere, D. (2023). The impact of smartphone use on course comprehension and psychological well-being in the college classroom. Innovative Higher Education, 48(3), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09638-1

Joshi, S. C., Woodward, J., & Woltering, S. (2022). Cell phone use distracts young adults from academic work with limited benefit to self-regulatory behavior. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03830-4

Kemp, S. (2021). Digital youth in South-East Asia 2021. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-youth-in-south-east-asia-2021

Kemp, S. (2024, January 31). Digital 2024: Global overview report. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-global-overview-report

Kwon, M., Kim, D.-J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The Smartphone Addiction Scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLOS ONE, 8(12), Article e83558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558

Lee, K. W., Ching, S. M., Ali, N., Ooi, C. Y., Sidek, S. K. H., Amat, A., Yatim, Y., Yahaya, Z., Shamsuddin, N., Ibrahim, I., Majid, F. A., Othman, F. S., Zakaria, N. S., Abidin, A., Talib, N. H., & Sivaratnam, D. (2023). Prevalence and factors associated with smartphone addiction among adolescents: A nationwide study in Malaysia. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 25(2), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2023.013407

Li, M., Zhao, R., Dang, X., Xu, X., Chen, R., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., & Wu, D. (2024). Causal relationships between screen use, reading, and brain development in early adolescents. Advanced Science, 11, Article 2307540. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202307540

Marciano, L., Camerini, A.-L., & Kaess, M. (2022). Duration, frequency, and time distortion: Which is the best predictor of problematic smartphone use in adolescents? A trace data study. PLOS ONE, 17(2), Article e0263815. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263815

Marini, L., Hendriani, W., & Wulandari, P. Y. (2025). Validation of the Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version (SAS-SV) for measuring problematic smartphone use in Indonesian adolescents. KnE Social Sciences, 10(9), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i9.18498

Mayerhofer, D., Haider, K., Amon, M., Gächter, A., O’Rourke, T., Dale, R., Humer, E., Probst, T., & Pieh, C. (2024). The association between problematic smartphone use and mental health in Austrian adolescents and young adults. Healthcare, 12(6), Article 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12060600

Minerales, M. A. A., Malayao, S. O., Jr., Salic-Hairulla, M. A., Sayson, N. L. B., & Magallanes, J. B. (2025). Developing short stories in teaching both physics content and reading skills. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(4), 2242–2254. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i4.21470

Misanes, R. M., & Pascual, M. (2023). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) performance of Grade 8 students: Basis for a reading intervention program. https://scimatic.org/storage/journals/11/pdfs/1946.pdf

Namol, C. G., & Bacang, A. G. B. (2024). Reading interest and proficiency of Grade 7 learners. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0122

Nawaz, S. (2023). Rethinking classifications and metrics for problematic smartphone use and dependence: Addressing the call for reassessment. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, Article 100327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100327

Olson, J. A., Sandra, D. A., Colucci, É. S., Al Bikaii, A., Chmoulevitch, D., Nahas, J., Raz, A., & Veissière, S. P. L. (2022). Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: A meta-analysis of 24 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, Article 107138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107138

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Paterna, A., Alcaraz-Ibáñez, M., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Salavera, C., Demetrovics, Z., & Griffiths, M. D. (2024). Problematic smartphone use and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 13(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2024.00014

Ratanasiripong, P., Hanklang, S., Nungdanjark, W., Thongthammarat, Y., & Ramon, E. (2024). Predictors of mental health among secondary school students in Thailand: The roles of grit, self-esteem, and smartphone addiction. Thai Journal of Public Health, 54(2), 903–917. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jph/article/view/269627

Sánchez-Vincitore, L. V., Veras, C., Mencía-Ripley, A., Ruiz-Matuk, C. B., & Cubilla-Bonnetier, D. (2022). Reading comprehension precursors: Evidence of the simple view of reading in a transparent orthography. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 914414. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.914414

Tabian, M. J. M. (2025). Reading performance of Grade 5 learners: Basis for reading program. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 10(5). https://ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2505430.pdf

UNICEF. (2020). Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metrics 2019: National report of the Philippines. UNICEF Philippines. https://www.unicef.org/philippines/media/2556/file/Southeast%20Asia%20Primary%20Learning%20Metrics%202019%20National%20Report%20of%20the%20Philippines.pdf

UNICEF & SEAMEO. (2020). SEA-PLM 2019 main regional report: Children’s learning in 6 Southeast Asian countries. https://www.seaplm.org/PUBLICATIONS/regional%20results/SEA-PLM%202019%20Main%20Regional%20Report.pdf

UNICEF, UNESCO, & World Bank. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/state-of-global-learning-poverty

University of Phoenix. (2023). Causal-comparative research. https://www.phoenix.edu/content/dam/edu/research/doc/2023/causal-comparative-research.pdf

Vaghasiya, S., Rajpopat, N., Parmar, B., Tailor, K. A., Patel, H. V., & Varma, J. (2023). Pattern of smartphone use, prevalence and correlates of problematic use of smartphone and social media among school going adolescents. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 32(2), 410–416. https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_53_23

Xiao, B., Zhao, H., Hein-Salvi, C., Parent, N., & Shapka, J. D. (2025). Exploring the trajectories of problematic smartphone use in adolescence: Insights from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12570

Zamudio, R. F. (2023). The foundational skills in reading of the junior high school of Paracale National High School. E-Saliksik: DepEd Research Portal. https://e-saliksik.deped.gov.ph/the-foundational-skills-in-reading-of-the-junior-high-school-of-paracale-national-high-school/

Downloads

Published

2026-11-06

How to Cite

Orillaneda, R., & Antiquina, A. . (2026). Differences in Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) Reading Comprehension Scores Between Heavy and Light Smartphone Users Among Junior High School Students of Dinuyan Integrated School, Division of Surigao Del Sur: A Causal-Comparative Quantitative Study. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(11), 532-545. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24030824

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1235

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>