Between Memes and Meanings: Exploring the Linguistic Implications of Gen Z Digital Language on Intergenerational Communication in Basic Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22112041Keywords:
Generation Z digital language, intergenerational communication, semiotics, pragmatics, mixed methods, UGNAYAN Framework, language educationAbstract
Generation Z digital language has transformed contemporary communication through the widespread use of emojis, internet slang, abbreviations, memes, GIFs, and other multimodal digital expressions. While these linguistic innovations facilitate interaction among digitally fluent users, they also present interpretive challenges in educational settings where students, teachers, and administrators possess diverse communicative experiences and generational perspectives. This study examined the linguistic implications of Generation Z digital language on intergenerational communication within the basic educational system and proposed a pedagogical and language development framework to strengthen communication across generations. Employing a concurrent exploratory mixed methods design, the study integrated qualitative and quantitative approaches guided by Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics and Communication Accommodation Theory. Qualitative data were gathered through open-ended written responses in a researcher-developed mixed-methods questionnaire and analyzed through a Gadamerian-informed thematic interpretive process. The findings revealed eight major themes across the semiotic and pragmatic dimensions, demonstrating that digital language functions as an evolving communicative system in which symbolic interpretation, contextual understanding, interpersonal expectations, and communicative intent collectively shape intergenerational communication. Quantitative findings further indicated that both the semiotic and pragmatic dimensions were perceived as Highly Influential, confirming the substantial role of Generation Z digital language in educational communication. The integration of qualitative and quantitative evidence identified three underlying factors—Pragmatic Boundary Alignment, Semiotic Deciphering Friction, and Contextual Dependency—which served as the empirical foundation for the development of the UGNAYAN (Ugnayan ng Generasyon sa Bagong Anyo ng Komunikasyon) Framework. The framework consists of four interconnected pillars: Generational Awareness and Relational Sensitivity, Bidirectional Mentorship and Co-Learning, Institutionalized Netiquette and Capacity Building, and Cultural Integration and Grassroots Media Campaigns. Collectively, the findings emphasize that effective intergenerational communication depends on contextual awareness, reciprocal adaptation, and collaborative meaning-making, offering practical guidance for language education and communication practices within the basic educational system.
Downloads
References
Alsaigh, R., & Coyne, I. (2021). Doing a hermeneutic phenomenology research underpinned by Gadamer's philosophy: A framework to facilitate data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047820
Bukhari, S. U. P., Ali, I., Faruqui, A., & Imran, A. (2025). Bridging the generational language gap: A study on the intergenerational comprehension of Gen Z's language. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.3.31
Chen, Y., Yang, X., Howman, H., & Filik, R. (2024). Individual differences in emoji comprehension: Gender, age, and culture. PLOS ONE, 19(2), Article e0297379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297379
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.
Danesi, M. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i4.1041
Giles, H., Edwards, A. L., & Walther, J. B. (2023). Communication accommodation theory: Past accomplishments, current trends, and future prospects. Language Sciences, 99, Article 101571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101571
Haghiri-Vijeh, R., & McDonald, C. (2022). Gadamerian hermeneutics with intersectionality as an analytical lens. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jah.v2022Y2022.74902
Herring, S. C., & Dainas, A. R. (2020). Gender and age influences on interpretation of emoji functions. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 3(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375540
McCulloch, G. (2019). Because internet: Understanding the new rules of language. Riverhead Books.
Tagg, C. (2023). The discourse of text messaging: Analysis of SMS communication. Routledge.
Tarrayo, V. N., & Oducado, R. M. (2022). "The teacher is online": Exploring Filipino university teachers’ experiences and perceptions of teacher-student communication through social media. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(2), 651–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.2.21.651
Valencia, A. M. (2021). The emoji gap: Semiotics of intergenerational digital communication in Philippine higher education. AsTEN Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1), 12–30.
Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive statistics: Reporting the answers to the 5 basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(5), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002421
Wu, D., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. (2024). Is there an intergenerational discrepancy in the comprehension and aesthetic preference regarding emoji usage? Evidence from WeChat. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1424728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1424728
Zhukova, M., & Herring, S. C. (2024). Benign or toxic? Differences in emoji interpretation by gender, generation, and emoji type. Language@Internet, 22, 74–108. https://doi.org/10.14434/li.v22.40800
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.