Data Literacy and Mathematical Decision-Making Skills Among Secondary School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19726139Keywords:
data literacy, mathematical, decision-making, secondary school students, mathematics education, evidence-based reasoning, quantitative studyAbstract
Set against the growing demand for evidence-based learning, this study examined data literacy and mathematical decision-making skills among secondary school students at Santo Tomas National High School in Santo Tomas, Isabela. Using a quantitative cross-sectional explanatory design, the study gathered data from students selected through total population sampling. A researcher-structured questionnaire was used to measure the two variables. The instrument underwent expert validation and pilot testing, yielding Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.91 for data literacy, 0.89 for mathematical decision-making skills, and 0.93 overall. Data were analyzed using weighted mean, standard deviation, Shapiro-Wilk test, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and simple linear regression. Findings revealed that students demonstrated high levels of data literacy and mathematical decision-making skills, with mean scores of 3.86 and 3.88, respectively. Normality screening confirmed the suitability of parametric analysis. Correlation results showed a significant positive relationship between the two variables (r = 0.68, p < 0.05). Regression analysis further indicated that data literacy significantly predicted mathematical decision-making skills and explained 46.2 percent of the variance in the dependent variable. The study concluded that stronger data literacy corresponded with better mathematical decision-making among students. It was recommended that mathematics instruction place stronger emphasis on data interpretation, evidence-based reasoning, and contextualized decision tasks to enhance students’ higher-order mathematical competencies.
Downloads
References
Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. (2020). Pre-K–12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II (GAISE II): A framework for statistics and data science education. American Statistical Association.
Dorsey, C., Sagrans, J., Yaneva, K., O’Brien, D., Collins, I., Gannon-Slater, N., Jalbert, A., Kastelein, K., Laver, P., Reilly, J., & Schwein, P. (2025). Integrating data literacy into K–12 education. Harvard Data Science Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.24d90bdc
OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes: Philippines. OECD Publishing.
Schreiter, S., Friedrich, A., Fuhr, H., Malone, S., Brünken, R., Kuhn, J., & Vogel, M. (2024). Teaching for statistical and data literacy in K–12 STEM education: A systematic review on teacher variables, teacher education, and impacts on classroom practice. ZDM Mathematics Education, 56, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01531-1
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
UNICEF Philippines. (2024). Education factsheet. UNICEF Philippines.
World Bank. (2026, April 3). World Bank backs better learning for 21 million Filipino students. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.