Data Literacy and Mathematical Decision-Making Skills Among Secondary School Students

Authors

  • Jelly L. Paccarangan Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19726139

Keywords:

data literacy, mathematical, decision-making, secondary school students, mathematics education, evidence-based reasoning, quantitative study

Abstract

Set against the growing demand for evidence-based learning, this study examined data literacy and mathematical decision-making skills among secondary school students at Santo Tomas National High School in Santo Tomas, Isabela. Using a quantitative cross-sectional explanatory design, the study gathered data from students selected through total population sampling. A researcher-structured questionnaire was used to measure the two variables. The instrument underwent expert validation and pilot testing, yielding Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.91 for data literacy, 0.89 for mathematical decision-making skills, and 0.93 overall. Data were analyzed using weighted mean, standard deviation, Shapiro-Wilk test, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and simple linear regression. Findings revealed that students demonstrated high levels of data literacy and mathematical decision-making skills, with mean scores of 3.86 and 3.88, respectively. Normality screening confirmed the suitability of parametric analysis. Correlation results showed a significant positive relationship between the two variables (r = 0.68, p < 0.05). Regression analysis further indicated that data literacy significantly predicted mathematical decision-making skills and explained 46.2 percent of the variance in the dependent variable. The study concluded that stronger data literacy corresponded with better mathematical decision-making among students. It was recommended that mathematics instruction place stronger emphasis on data interpretation, evidence-based reasoning, and contextualized decision tasks to enhance students’ higher-order mathematical competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. (2020). Pre-K–12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II (GAISE II): A framework for statistics and data science education. American Statistical Association.

Dorsey, C., Sagrans, J., Yaneva, K., O’Brien, D., Collins, I., Gannon-Slater, N., Jalbert, A., Kastelein, K., Laver, P., Reilly, J., & Schwein, P. (2025). Integrating data literacy into K–12 education. Harvard Data Science Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.24d90bdc

OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en

OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes: Philippines. OECD Publishing.

Schreiter, S., Friedrich, A., Fuhr, H., Malone, S., Brünken, R., Kuhn, J., & Vogel, M. (2024). Teaching for statistical and data literacy in K–12 STEM education: A systematic review on teacher variables, teacher education, and impacts on classroom practice. ZDM Mathematics Education, 56, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01531-1

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501

UNICEF Philippines. (2024). Education factsheet. UNICEF Philippines.

World Bank. (2026, April 3). World Bank backs better learning for 21 million Filipino students. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Paccarangan, J. (2026). Data Literacy and Mathematical Decision-Making Skills Among Secondary School Students. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(4), 1310-1320. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19726139

Similar Articles

141-150 of 275

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.