Manipulative-Based Mathematics Instruction and Number Sense Development Among Grade 3 Pupils
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19732000Keywords:
manipulative-based instruction, mathematics learning, number sense, Grade 3 pupils, concrete materials, symbolic reasoningAbstract
This study explored how manipulative-based mathematics instruction shaped the number sense development of Grade 3 pupils at Dalena Elementary School in San Pablo, Isabela. Using a quantitative instructional association design, it determined the contribution of concrete material use, guided exploration, learner participation, and connection to mathematical symbols to pupils’ place value understanding, number comparison, operation sense, estimation, and flexible problem solving. Data were gathered through a validated researcher-made instrument with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.91. Weighted mean, standard deviation, and Partial Least Squares Path Modeling were employed to analyze the data. Findings showed that manipulative-based mathematics instruction was generally high, with concrete material use emerging as the most evident classroom practice. Number sense development was likewise high, particularly in place value understanding and number comparison. However, estimation and flexible problem solving appeared as the weakest area, indicating that pupils still experienced difficulty in judging the reasonableness of answers and using varied solution strategies. Path modeling revealed that all dimensions of manipulative-based instruction significantly influenced number sense development, with connection to mathematical symbols identified as the strongest predictor. The study concluded that manipulatives became more effective when teachers intentionally linked concrete experiences to symbolic reasoning. It recommended strengthening guided questioning, pupil explanation, and problem-based manipulative activities to support deeper and more flexible mathematical understanding among Grade 3 learners
Downloads
References
Abrahan, L. L. (2025). MOVE IT TO LEARN IT: Enhancing multiplication skills of Grade 3 pupils using
manipulatives. Davao Research Journal, 16(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v16i1.282
Bognar, B., Mužar Horvat, S., & Jukić Matić, L. (2025). Characteristics of effective elementary mathematics
instruction: A scoping review of experimental studies. Education Sciences, 15(1), Article 76.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010076
Bungao-Abarquez, E. (2020). The use of manipulative in teaching elementary mathematics. International Journal of
Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(11), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.11.3
Department of Education. (2022). Basic Education Development Plan 2030. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2022/05/DO_s2022_024.pdf
Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG mathematics curriculum guide: Grades 1, 4, and 7.
https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/MATATAG-Mathematics-CG-Grades1-4-and-7.pdf
Education Endowment Foundation. (2017). Improving mathematics in key stages two and three: Guidance report.
Education Endowment Foundation.
Hodgen, J., Barclay, N., Foster, C., Gilmore, C., Marks, R., & Simms, V. (2020). Early years and key stage 1
mathematics teaching: Evidence review. Education Endowment Foundation.
Larbi, E., & Mavis, O. (2016). The use of manipulatives in mathematics education. Journal of Education and Practice,
7(36), 53–61.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2020). Catalyzing change in early childhood and elementary
mathematics: Initiating critical conversations. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II) country note:
Philippines. OECD Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.