The Unheard Narratives of Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Tutors: A Study on Implementation Realities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21725417Keywords:
ARAL Program, Project REVAMP, implementation realities, ARAL tutors, literacy intervention, thematic analysisAbstract
This study explored the implementation realities of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program through the experiences, challenges, and coping strategies of eighteen teaching and non-teaching tutors implementing Project REVAMP in a public secondary school in Santiago City. A qualitative-descriptive research design was employed. Data were obtained through a researcher-developed and expert-validated semi-structured interview guide, recorded during face-to-face interviews, transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings showed that program implementation was experienced as challenging yet fulfilling. Tutors accepted responsibilities beyond their regular duties and drew motivation from learners’ gradual improvement in reading skills, confidence, and participation. Five implementation challenges emerged: limited instructional time, insufficient learning resources, diverse learner needs combined with high tutor-to-learner ratios, additional workload, and limited professional training. Tutors responded through differentiated and learner-centered instruction, the development and use of supplementary and contextualized learning materials, and collaboration and resource sharing with colleagues and school stakeholders. The study concludes that the commitment, creativity, and adaptability of tutors sustained literacy intervention despite substantial institutional and instructional constraints. Effective and sustainable implementation therefore requires protected instructional time, adequate level-appropriate materials, manageable tutor assignments, continuous capacity building, and structured collaborative support. These findings provide school-level evidence for strengthening ARAL and future literacy-recovery initiatives.
Downloads
References
Acido, J. V., & Caballes, D. G. (2024). Assessing educational progress: A comparative analysis of PISA results (2018 vs. 2022) and HDI correlation in the Philippines. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0020
Adapon, M. T., & Mangila, B. B. (2020). Helping struggling readers to read: The impact of the care for the non-readers (CRN) program on Filipino pupils’ reading proficiency. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 6(2), 195–218. https://journal3.uinalauddin.ac.id/index.php/Eternal/article/download/13809/10253
Aguinaldo, M. (2026). Challenges encountered and strategies of the key stage 2 ARAL tutors in the implementation of the ARAL Program: Philippine education. Divine Word International Journal of Management and Humanities, 5(2), 3528–3549. https://doi.org/10.62025/dwijmh.v5i2.335
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivist learning theory: Enhancing student learning and engagement. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2172929. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Baldevarona, S. B. (2020). Behind the reading program: A phenomenological study on teachers’ challenges and strategic reading interventions to help struggling readers (Doctoral dissertation, Foundation University). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27846.80966
Banzon, C. J., & Elan, H. J. (2025). Teaching reading in a time-constrained environment: Challenges and strategies for effective instruction. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 38(4), 378–392.
Carreon, R. M. A., Iglesias, J.-A. S., Trinidad, A. E., & Orio, A. C. (2026). Grade 2 teachers lived experiences in the ARAL Reading Program: A qualitative phenomenological study. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 52(6), 701–725. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2026/v52i63128
Casingal, C. P. (2022). Efficacy of PHIL-IRI and remedial classes for Filipinos at the intermediate level. Journal of Sustainable Business, Economics and Finance, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.31039/josbef.2022.1.2.22
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Department of Education. (2024). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program (DepEd Order No. 013, s. 2024).
Department of Education. (2025). DepEd Order No. 018, s. 2025: Implementing guidelines of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph
Forbes, M. (2022). Braun and Clarke’s Thematic analysis: A practical guide [Review of the book Thematic analysis: A practical guide, by V. Braun & V. Clarke]. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 22(2), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X211058251
Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Institute of Education Sciences.
Hatmanto, E. D., & Rahmawati, F. (2023). Crafting dynamic lesson plans: Designing differentiated learning approaches for teaching reading skills in the Philippines. Proceeding International Conference of Community Service, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/iccs.v1i2.124
Liu, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2024). Scaffolding strategies in modern education: Supporting student learning and independence. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03429
McMaster, K. L., Baker, K., Donegan, R., Hugh, M., & Sargent, K. (2021). Professional development to support teachers’ implementation of intensive reading intervention: A systematic review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(5), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520934099
Nurhuda, A., Rahman, M., & Sari, D. (2023). The implementation of constructivist learning in improving student participation and outcomes. Review of Education Research, 5(2), 152–160. https://rer.ba/index.php/rer/article/view/152
Peters, M. T., Hebbecker, K., & Souvignier, E. (2022). Effects of providing teachers with tools for implementing assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in second grade. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 47(3), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084211014926
Resnik, D. B. (2024). The ethics of research with human subjects: Protecting people, advancing science, promoting trust (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82757-0
Rondonuwu, J., Tumbel, A., & Wullur, M. (2024). Implementation of constructivism in learning: A literature review. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386285027
Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
UNESCO. (2021). Learning recovery after COVID-19: Global education response. https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/education-response
UNESCO. (2022). Transforming education through literacy programs. https://www.unesco.org/en/literacy
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
World Bank. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/state-of-global-learning-poverty
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.