Implementation of Project ConVERGE and Productivity of Abaca Farmers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20612483Keywords:
abaca farming, agricultural value chain, Camiguin, farmer productivity, Project ConVERGE, rural developmentAbstract
This study assessed the implementation of the Convergence on Value Chain Enhancement for Rural Growth and Empowerment (Project ConVERGE) and the productivity of abaca farmers in Camiguin Province. A quantitative survey design, supplemented by casual interviews, was employed. Through total enumeration, the study involved 103 abaca farmers who owned more than one hectare of abaca production area, belonged to assisted Agrarian Reform Beneficiary Organizations, and had engaged in abaca farming for at least five years in Mambajao, Catarman, and Sagay. Data were analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, weighted means, standard deviations, independent-samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey post hoc comparisons, and ranking. Project ConVERGE was implemented to a moderate extent (TAWM = 2.82, SD = 1.03). Strong implementation was evident in storage and processing facilities, planting materials, technical guidance, fiber-quality support, and buyer linkages. Gaps remained in local funding, farm-to-market roads, credit access, financial-management assistance, and information on subsidies. Significant differences in implementation were found when respondents were grouped according to age (p = .013) and average monthly income (p = .016), but not according to sex (p = .717) or the number of trainings attended (p = .324). Productivity indicators generally improved from 2021 to 2025, particularly fiber yield, harvesting performance, fiber quality, and income. The most pressing concerns were limited time to participate in activities outside Camiguin, inadequate financial support, and changing project directives. The findings indicate that Project ConVERGE contributed to the revitalization of abaca farming, although stronger financial inclusion, infrastructure support, monitoring, and locally accessible capacity-building activities are needed to sustain its gains.
Downloads
References
Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(11), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336
Asante, B. O., Villano, R. A., & Battese, G. E. (2022). The effect of adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices on household food security in Ghana. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 9, 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100342
Bales, M. C., Yap, K. L. P., Baliña, F. T., & Casinillo, L. F. (2024). Interaction and problems in the abaca industry in Region VIII, Philippines. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration, 15(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.15.1.3137.2025
Briones, R. M. (2021). Transformation of the agri-food system in the Philippines: Trends, drivers, and implications. Philippine Journal of Development, 45(1), 1–28.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dhillon, R., & Moncur, Q. (2023). Small-scale farming: A review of challenges and potential opportunities offered by technological advancements. Sustainability, 15(21), 15478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115478
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). The state of food and agriculture 2022: Leveraging automation in agriculture for transforming agrifood systems. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9479en
International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2023). Rural development report 2023: Transacting with the state - Rethinking rural development in middle-income countries. https://doi.org/10.58173/IFAD-RDR2023
Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209779
Malapit, H., Ragasa, C., Martinez, E. M., Rubin, D., Seymour, G., & Quisumbing, A. (2020). Empowerment in agricultural value chains: Mixed methods evidence from the Philippines. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.003
Markelova, H., Meinzen-Dick, R., Hellin, J., & Dohrn, S. (2009). Collective action for smallholder market access. Food Policy, 34(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.001
Mojo, D., Fischer, C., & Degefa, T. (2021). Collective action and aspirations: The impact of cooperatives on Ethiopian smallholder farmers’ aspirations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 92(3), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12301
Nor Diana, M., Zulkepli, N. A., Ern, L. K., & Zainol, M. R. (2024). Factors affecting behavioral intentions of farmers in Southeast Asia to technology adoption: A systematic review analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 367, 122045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122045
Philippine Fiber Industry Development Authority. (2024). Abaca production performance report, 2023. Department of Agriculture. https://philfida.da.gov.ph
Philippine Information Agency. (2021, March 3). DAR Camiguin turns over abaca facilities worth P2.8M. PIA News. https://pia.gov.ph
Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2022). Public-private-producers partnerships (4Ps) and the facilitator-driven agricultural value chain model (PIDS Policy Notes No. 2022-07). https://pids.gov.ph/publication/policy-notes
Sürücü, L., & Maslakçi, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
Verhofstadt, E., & Maertens, M. (2020). Cooperative membership and agricultural performance: Evidence from Rwanda. World Development, 129, 104875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104875
World Bank. (2020). Agriculture and food: An opportunity to improve rural livelihoods. https://doi.org/10.1596/33649
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.