Indigenous People Education (IPEd) Program on Learners’ Engagement and Cultural Identity Development in Geographically Isolated and Disadvantaged Areas (GIDA)

Authors

  • Jezza L. Dakingking Klubi Elementary School, Schools Division of South Cotabato, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21682994

Keywords:

Indigenous Peoples Education, learner engagement, cultural identity development, culturally responsive education, community participation, geographically isolated and disadvantaged areas

Abstract

This study examined the implementation of the Indigenous People Education (IPEd) Program and its prediction of learners’ engagement and cultural identity development in geographically isolated and disadvantaged schools in Lake Sebu East District 1, Schools Division of South Cotabato. A quantitative descriptive-correlational design and complete enumeration were used, involving five school administrators, 55 teachers, and 143 Grade 6 learners (N = 203). Data were collected through researcher-adapted questionnaires validated by six experts and pilot-tested in comparable Indigenous schools. Means, standard deviations, and multiple linear regression were used for analysis. The IPEd Program was implemented at a Very High level (M = 4.34, SD = 0.82), led by learning resources (M = 4.38) and community participation (M = 4.35). Learner engagement was Very High (M = 4.51, SD = 0.70), with behavioral engagement rated highest, while cultural identity development was also Very High (M = 4.48, SD = 0.74), led by cultural pride and values. The IPEd dimensions collectively predicted learner engagement (adjusted R² = .52) and cultural identity development (adjusted R² = .47). Community participation was the strongest predictor of engagement (β = .453, p < .001), whereas learning resources had the strongest standardized effect on cultural identity development (β = .327, p < .001). Instructional strategies and learning resources were significant in both models, while curriculum integration was not independently significant. The findings indicate that culturally relevant content becomes most influential when supported by authentic materials, responsive pedagogy, and sustained participation of elders, culture bearers, families, and communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2020). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (2nd ed., pp. 57–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9

Bacala, R. M., & Ponce, E. M. (2023). Indigenous Peoples Education (IPEd) implementation in Philippine public schools: Community engagement and culturally responsive practices. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(9), 3258–3272. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.09.27

Brayboy, B. M. J., Castagno, A. E., Solyom, J. A., & Demmert, W. G. (2019). Culturally responsive schooling for Indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Arizona State University, Center for Indian Education.

Canaza-Cabrera, J. B. (2020). From Indigenous education to decolonizing education: The challenge of Indigenous knowledge systems in Philippine basic education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.9

Castagno, A. E. (2021). The edges of intersection: Indigenous education and culturally responsive schooling. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003134896

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Department of Education. (2011). DepEd Order No. 62, s. 2011: Adopting the National Indigenous Peoples Education Policy Framework.

Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 32, s. 2015: Adopting the Indigenous Peoples Education Curriculum Framework.

Dizon, R. C. (2020). Contextualized instructional materials and culturally responsive teaching among Indigenous learners in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Studies in Social Sciences, 1(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.53402/ijesss.v1i2.61

Esparrago-Kalidas, A. J. (2023). Challenges in implementing a culturally sustaining pedagogy in Indigenous formal education. Journal of Indigenous Social Development, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jisd.v13i3.81550

Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-04031-0

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Asking a different question (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

McCarty, T. L., & Lee, T. S. (2021). Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and Indigenous education sovereignty. In N. S. Nasir, C. D. Lee, R. Pea, & M. M. de Royston (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 97–115). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203762267

Miole, G. L. (2024). Cultural interface in action: A case study of Philippine Indigenous educational policy. IAFOR Journal of Education, 12(3), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.3.11

Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2020). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.

Phinney, J. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.499

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Taherdoost, H. (2017). Determining sample size: How to calculate survey sample size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2, 237–239.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education.

Verdida, V. A. M., Malon, C. G., & Macalisang, D. S. (2024). Lived experiences of Indigenous People’s Education teachers in integrating the IPEd curriculum. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0193

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Dakingking, J. (2026). Indigenous People Education (IPEd) Program on Learners’ Engagement and Cultural Identity Development in Geographically Isolated and Disadvantaged Areas (GIDA). International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(7), 2331-2339. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21682994

Similar Articles

11-20 of 620

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.