Academic Experiences in Philosophy Among STEM- Grade 11 Students in the Online Mode of Instruction

Authors

  • Kenneth V. Ragaza, LPT, MAEd, Ed.D.(c) Cebu Normal University, Cebu City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18777800

Keywords:

academic experiences, online learning, Philosophy, STEM students, blended learning, critical thinking, student engagement, modular learning, inquiry-based learning, instructional design

Abstract

This study explores the academic experiences of STEM Grade 11 students in Philosophy under an online mode of instruction. Given the challenges of distance learning, particularly in a subject that requires critical thinking and deep reasoning, the study examines the factors that impact student engagement, comprehension, and performance. Using a narrative research design, qualitative data were collected and analyzed to assess students' study habits, learning challenges, and instructional delivery effectiveness. The findings indicate that students struggle with the conceptual and abstract nature of Philosophy, particularly in developing reasoning skills and applying philosophical concepts to real-world situations. The modular learning system, lack of interactive discussions, and limited teacher feedback further compound these difficulties. The research highlights the importance of fostering an interactive and inquiry-based learning environment that promotes questioning and deeper understanding. Drawing on theoretical insights from Heidegger and Kant, the study underscores the need to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application through innovative teaching strategies. To address these challenges, the paper recommends enhancement programs such as webinars, online debates, and interactive student conferences to improve engagement and comprehension. The study contributes to the broader discourse on online learning in the humanities, emphasizing the necessity of tailored instructional designs that support student-centered learning. The findings serve as a valuable resource for educators, school administrators, and policymakers in refining teaching methodologies to enhance students' philosophical reasoning and overall academic performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gorichanaz, T. (2019). Questioning and understanding in the library: A philosophy of technology perspective. Education for Information, 35(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-180230

Jankowiak, T. (n.d.). Kant, Immanuel. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 8, 2022, from https://iep.utm.edu/kantview/#SH5c

Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., Lu, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). The effect of the online and offline blended teaching mode on English as a foreign language learners’ listening performance in a Chinese context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 742742. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742742

Lalima, & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116

Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280-312.

Verde, A., & Valero, J. M. (2021). Teaching and learning modalities in higher education during the pandemic: Responses to coronavirus disease from Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 648592. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648592

Wang, Q., Huang, C., Hu, X., & Mei, H. (2021). The application of the online and offline interactive teaching method in clinical anesthesiology teaching. Education Research International, 2021, Article 3098374. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3098374

Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (1998). Academic and social motivational influences on students' academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), 155-175.

Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250.

Zhou, J., Zhao, K., & Dawson, P. (2020). How first-year students perceive and experience assessment of academic literacies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1637513

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Ragaza, K. (2026). Academic Experiences in Philosophy Among STEM- Grade 11 Students in the Online Mode of Instruction. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(2), 1040-1053. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18777800

Similar Articles

21-30 of 127

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.