Teachers’ Technological Readiness and Attitudes Toward Learning Management System Adoption: Basis for Faculty Enhancement Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23319022Keywords:
learning management system, technological readiness, teacher attitudes, TPACK, technology acceptance, faculty enhancement programAbstract
This study assessed elementary teachers’ technological readiness and attitudes toward learning management system (LMS) adoption at Casa Del Niño Schools System Inc. as the basis for a faculty enhancement program. Using a quantitative descriptive-evaluative design, the study involved all 66 eligible generalist elementary teachers during School Year 2025–2026 through total enumeration. A survey adapted from technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and LMS-attitude instruments gathered demographic information, ratings across seven readiness domains, and ratings of usefulness, ease of use, attitude, behavioral intention, and competency. Frequency, percentage, and mean were used to analyze the responses. The respondents were predominantly female (65.2%) and aged 22–29 years (75.75%). Overall technological readiness was very high (M = 3.26), with lower domain means in Content Knowledge (M = 3.12), Pedagogical Content Knowledge (M = 3.21), and integrated TPACK (M = 3.23). Overall LMS-adoption attitude was highly positive (M = 3.55); behavioral intention recorded the highest dimension mean (M = 3.64), whereas self-rated competency was relatively lowest (M = 3.45). A proposed six-month, TPACK-anchored faculty enhancement program therefore prioritizes subject-specific LMS lesson design, guided practice, peer mentoring, and formative monitoring. These descriptive findings indicate favorable perceived readiness and acceptance while identifying targeted professional-learning needs; the proposed program has not yet been evaluated for effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Abella, J. L., & Dela Rosa, E. (2023). Digital literacy and digital competence of selected Filipino teachers: Basis for a post-pandemic pedagogy. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(5), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i5.378
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Caballo, J. H. S., Regidor, J. C., Alayacyac, J. R. S., Abellanosa, J. E., & Monajan, G. J. G. (2024). Computer self-efficacy and effectiveness of Quipper learning management system. Formosa Journal of Computer and Information Science, 3(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjcis.v3i2.11526
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Galura, J. C., Delos Reyes, E. G., & Pineda, J. L. S. (2023). C5-LMS design using Google Classroom: User acceptance based on extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 6074–6083. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2028852
Garcia, R. C., Arpilleda, A. J., Mallillin, S. M., & Abadiano, M. N. (2022). Utilization of Quipper application as learning management system in teaching as experienced by the junior high school teachers of St. Paul University Surigao. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 5(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v5i1p113
Knowles, M. S. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Gulf Publishing.
Lachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., Küchler, U., Paravicini, W., Randler, C., & Thomas, P. (2021). Fostering pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A quasi-experimental field study. Computers & Education, 174, Article 104304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104304
Mane, M. S. B. (2025). Teachers’ readiness and the integration of technology in teaching. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research, 7(3), 260–290. https://www.ijmcer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IJMCER_O0730260290.pdf
Mangarin, R. A., Pacatang, J. R., Peligor, J. B., & Limpangog, C. M. (2024). The Quipper way of learning mathematics: Through the spectrum of major subjects. TWIST Journal, 19(2), 120–131. https://twistjournal.net/twist/article/view/197
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready? Computers in Human Behavior, 118, Article 106675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675
Sesmiarni, Z., Hoque, M. E., Susanto, P., Islam, M. A., & Hendrayati, H. (2024). Adoption of SPACE-learning management system in education era 4.0: An extended technology acceptance model with self-efficacy. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1457188. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1457188
Yeh, Y.-F., Chan, K. K. H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2021). Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computers & Education, 171, Article 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
