Science Process Skills and Environmental Responsibility Among Elementary Pupils: Toward Sustainable Science Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19724325Keywords:
Science process skills, environmental responsibility, sustainable science learning, elementary pupils, inquiry-based science, environmental educationAbstract
This study examined the relationship between science process skills and environmental responsibility among elementary pupils in the City of Ilagan, Isabela as basis for strengthening sustainable science learning. Using a predictive-correlational explanatory design, the study assessed pupils’ science process skills in terms of observing, classifying, measuring, inferring, predicting, communicating, and simple investigating, while environmental responsibility was examined in terms of environmental awareness, conservation behavior, waste management practices, participation in environmental activities, and care for living and non-living components of the environment. Data were gathered through a validated researcher-made questionnaire with an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93, indicating excellent reliability. The findings showed that pupils demonstrated a high level of science process skills and a high level of environmental responsibility. However, simple investigating emerged as the weakest science process skill, while participation in environmental activities was the least developed area of environmental responsibility. Spearman’s rho revealed a significant moderate positive relationship between science process skills and environmental responsibility. Ordinal logistic regression further showed that simple investigating, inferring, predicting, observing, classifying, and communicating significantly predicted higher levels of environmental responsibility. These results suggest that pupils who are more capable of applying scientific thinking are also more likely to demonstrate responsible environmental behavior. The study concludes that sustainable science learning may be strengthened by integrating inquiry-based, hands-on, and action-oriented environmental activities in elementary science instruction. It recommends the implementation of school-based environmental projects, pupil-led investigations, and experiential science tasks that connect classroom learning with real environmental practices.
Downloads
References
Akkan, S. N., & Horzum, T. (2024). Illuminating the landscape of mathematical resilience: A systematic review. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 312–338. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202420093
Aravantinos, S., Lavidas, K., Komis, V., Karalis, T., & Papadakis, S. (2026). Artificial intelligence in K-12 education: A systematic review of teachers’ professional development needs for AI integration. Computers, 15(1), Article 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15010049
Department of Education. (2026). Foundational guidelines on artificial intelligence (AI) in basic education (Department Order No. 003, s. 2026). Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.
Hidayati, D. N., & Mahmudi, A. (2025). Mathematical resilience and student problem-solving in mathematics learning: Are there any connections? In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2022) (Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 957). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-481-5_22224
Joshi, D. R., Khanal, B., Sharma Chapai, K. P., & Singh, A. B. (2026). Role of secondary school students’ AI acceptance in mathematics learning in shaping academic achievement. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, Article 102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102235
Lee, S. J., & Kwon, K. (2024). A systematic review of AI education in K-12 classrooms from 2018 to 2023: Topics, strategies, and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100211
Neumann, I., Jeschke, C., & Heinze, A. (2021). First-year students’ resilience to cope with mathematics exercises in the university mathematics studies. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 42(2), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-020-00177-w
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II) country notes: Philippines. OECD.
UNESCO. (2025). AI and education: Protecting the rights of learners. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNESCO. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Xenofontos, C., & Mouroutsou, S. (2023). Resilience in mathematics education research: A systematic review of empirical studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(7), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2115132
Yarkwah, C., Kpotosu, C. K., & Gbormittah, D. (2024). Effect of test anxiety on students’ academic performance in mathematics at the senior high school level. Discover Education, 3, Article 245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00343-z
Zhong, B., & Liu, X. (2025). Evaluating AI literacy of secondary students: Framework and scale development. Computers & Education, 227, Article 105230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105230
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.