Sensory Quality Evaluation of Robusta Coffee Beans as Influenced by Drying Methods and Load Volume

Authors

  • Rommel F. Eladia Sultan Kudarat State University, ACCESS Campus San Sebastian College–Recoletos de Manila Author
  • Jesusa D. Ortuoste Sultan Kudarat State University, ACCESS Campus San Sebastian College–Recoletos de Manila Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20120441

Keywords:

Drying Method, Load Volume, Moisture Content, Postharvest Processing, Robusta Coffee, Sensory Quality

Abstract

This study evaluated how drying methods and load volume influence the sensory quality of Robusta coffee beans in Banga, South Cotabato, Philippines. Specifically, it examined the effects of three drying systems—bare concrete, portable drying beds, and a dryer with plastic cover—and three load volumes of 5, 10, and 15 kg/m² on drying performance, moisture content, and cup quality attributes. A two-factor factorial experiment arranged in a Completely Randomized Design with three replications was conducted. Freshly harvested Robusta coffee cherries were selectively harvested, sorted, washed, and subjected to assigned drying treatments until beans reached safe moisture levels. Sensory evaluation was conducted using standard cupping protocols by trained panelists, and data were analyzed through ANOVA and LSD at the 5% level of significance. Results showed that drying method significantly affected drying duration and final moisture content, with bare concrete drying the fastest and the plastic-covered dryer recording the longest drying period. Load volume did not significantly affect drying duration and moisture content. However, load volume significantly influenced salt–acid balance, overall cup quality, and cup score, while both drying method and load volume significantly influenced bitter–sweet balance. The 15 kg/m² load volume consistently produced higher sensory ratings, and the best treatment combination was the dryer with plastic cover at 15 kg/m². These findings indicate that optimizing load volume, particularly at 15 kg/m², is critical for enhancing Robusta cup quality, while controlled drying environments may further improve sensory stability and market value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agna, K. (2024). SOCCSKSARGEN Coffee Council says import revenues can help boost local coffee production. Philippine Information Agency. https://pia.gov.ph/soccsksargen-coffee-council-says-import-revenues-can-help-boost-local-coffee-production

Abdissa, Z. K., Tola, Y. B., & Taye, A. H. (2023). Drying time and layer thickness effects on coffee quality. International Journal of Food Science. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6677592

Abreu, D. J. M. d., Lourenço, M. S., Machado, G. G. L., Silva, J. M., Azevedo, E. C. d., & Carvalho, E. E. N. (2025). Influence of drying methods on the post-harvest quality of coffee: Effects on physicochemical, sensory, and microbiological composition. Foods, 14(9), Article 1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091463

Al-Ghamdi, S., Alfaifi, B., Elamin, W., et al. (2024). Advancements in coffee manufacturing: From dehydration techniques to quality control. Food Engineering Reviews, 16, 513–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-024-09383-5

Barrera López, J. (2022). The Effect of Roasting and Storage Conditions, and Beverage Preparation Methods on the Sensorial Characteristics of Coffee. Universidad de los Andes. Disponible en: https://hdl.handle.net/1992/58789

Basalong, A. A., Amado, V. Y., & Talbino, H. L. B. (2021). Effect of drying methods and load volume on microbial contaminants and cup quality of Arabica coffee. Mountain Journal of Science and Interdisciplinary Research (formerly Benguet State University Research Journal). http://portal.bsu.edu.ph:8083/index.php/brj/article/view/302

Baqueta, M. R., Caporaso, N., & Coqueiro, A. (2020). Coffee quality assessment based on sensory evaluation and analytical techniques. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344808672

Bunn, C., Läderach, P., Ovalle Rivera, O., & Kirschke, D. (2015). A bitter cup: Climate change profile of global production of Arabica and Robusta coffee. Climatic Change, 129(1–2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1306-x

Bureau of Agriculture and Fisheries Standards (BAFS). (2015). Code of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Coffee. Department of Agriculture, Philippines.

Caporaso, et. al. (2020). A review of coffee quality assessment based on sensory evaluation and advanced analytical techniques. ISBN: 978-1-53618-223-1

Casas-Junco, P. P., Ragazzo-Sánchez, J. A., Ascencio-Valle, J., & Calderón-Santoyo, M. (2017). Determination Of Potentially Mycotoxigenic Fungi in Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) From Nayarit. Food Science and Biotechnology, 27(3), 891. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10068-017-0288-7

Coradi PC, Martens S, Rodrigues HE, Leal AF, Costa DRd, et al. (2021). Development and validation of a heated drying air diffusion system to optimize rotary dryers and final coffee quality. PLOS ONE 16(6): e0251312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251312

Dong, W., Hu, R., Chu, Z., Zhao, J., & Tan, L. (2017). Effect of drying techniques on robusta coffee quality. Food Chemistry. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814617307410

Firdissa, E., Mohammed, A., & Berecha, G. (2022). Coffee drying and processing method influence quality. Journal of Food Quality. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/9184374

FAO. (2023). State of Agricultural Commodities Report 2023. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Fernando, A. J., Amaratunga, K. S. P., Dharmasena, D. A. N., & De Silva, T. H. K. R. (2025). Effect of temperature on drying kinetics and quality attributes of coffee beans during hot air drying. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 53(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v53i3.12590

Genovese, A., Caporaso, N., & Baiano, A. (2025). The Impact of Brewing Methods on the Quality of a Cup of Coffee. Beverages, 11(5), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages11050125

Ghosh, P., & Venkatachalapathy, N. (2014). Processing and drying of coffee: A review. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 3(12). http://www.ijert.org

Haile, M., & Hee Kang, W. (2020). The Harvest And Post-Harvest Management Practices’ Impact On Coffee Quality. Coffee - Production And Research. Https://Doi.Org/10.5772/Intechopen.89224

Huamán-Murillo, M. de J., Mejía Garcia, S. M., Murillo-Baca, S. M., Ponce-Rosas, F. C., & Fuentes-Meza, M. J. (2024). Physical and sensory quality of coffee dried in three prototypes of greenhouse solar dryers. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (LUZ), 41(2), e244112. https://doi.org/10.47280/RevFacAgron(LUZ).v41.n2.02

Hurtado Cortés, V., Orozco Blanco, DA, Salas Calderón, KT, Ramón Ossa, AL, Bustos Vanegas, JD, & Gutiérrez Guzmán, N. (2024). Mechanical Drying of Coffee: Influence of Operating Parameters on Cup Quality. Biotecnología En El Sector Agropecuario Y Agroindustrial , 23 (1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.18684/rbsaa.v23.n1.2025.2483

Industry Strategic Science and Technology Plans (ISPS) Platform. Industry Strategic Science and Technology Plans (ISPS) Platform. (N.D.). Https://Ispweb.Pcaarrd.Dost.Gov.Ph/Isp-Commodities/Coffee/

International Coffee Organization (ICO). (2005). Guide to coffee drying and processing. ICO Publications.

International Coffee Organization (ICO). (2020). Coffee Development Report 2020: The Value of Coffee – Sustainability, Inclusiveness, and Resilience of the Coffee Global Value Chain

International Coffee Organization (ICO). (2024). Coffee Market Report 2024.

Jakkaew, P., Yingchutrakul, Y., & Aunsri, N. (2024). A data-driven approach to improve coffee drying: Combining environmental sensors and chemical analysis. PLOS ONE, 19(2), e0296526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296526

Joosten, H. M. L. J., Goetz, J., Pittet, A., Schellenberg, M., & Bucheli, P. (2001). Production of ochratoxin A by Aspergillus carbonarius on coffee cherries. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 65(1–2), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00506-7

Karim, M. A., Wijayanti, F., & Sudaryanto, A. (2019). Comparative Studies of Coffee Processing Methods for Decision Making in Appropriate Technology Implementation. In M. A. Karim, F. Wijayanti, & A. Sudaryanto, Aip Conference Proceedings. American Institute Of Physics. Https://Doi.Org/10.1063/1.5112399

Kouadio, A. I., Agbo, N. G., Lebrihi, A., Mathieu, F., & Dosso, M. (2006). Effect of the frequency of the mixing of coffee cherries put out for drying on the kinetics of drying and the relationship to ochratoxin A production. Food additives and contaminants, 23(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030500469055

Kouadio, I. A., Koffi, L. B., Nemlin, J. G., & Dosso, M. B. (2012). Effect of Robusta (Coffea canephora P.) coffee cherries quantity put out for sun drying on contamination by fungi and ochratoxin A (OTA) under tropical humid zone (Côte d'Ivoire). Food and chemical toxicology: an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 50(6), 1969–1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.03.042

Krishnan, S. (2017). Sustainable Coffee Production. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. Retrieved 14 Jan. 2026, from https://oxfordre.com/environmentalscience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-224

Laurico, K. R., Lee, J. Y., Lee, B. H., & Kim, J. H. (2021). Consumers’ Valuation Of Local Specialty Coffee: The Case of Philippines. Journal Of The Korean Society Of International Agriculture, 33(4), 338–348. Https://Doi.Org/10.12719/Ksia.2021.33.4.338

Linda, M., Bastian, F., Mahendradatta, M., Tawali, A. B., & Laga, A. (2023). The effect of several postharvest processing on the quality of Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1200, 012011. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1200/1/012011

Lingle, T. R., & Menon, S. N. (2017). Cupping and grading—discovering character and quality. In B. Folmer (Ed.), The craft and science of coffee (pp. 181–203). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803520-7.00008-6

Mekonen H (2009). Influence of Genotype, Location, and processing methods on the quality of coffee (Coffee Arabica L.). An M.Sc. Dissertation, presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Hawasa University, Hawasa, Ethiopia. Pp: 42-71

Montavon, P., Duruz, E., Rumo, G., & Pratz, G. (2003). Evolution of green coffee protein profiles with maturation and relationship to coffee cup quality. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 51(8), 2328–2334. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020831j

Moon, S. A., Wongsakul, S., Kitazawa, H., & Saengrayap, R. (2024). Influence of Post-Harvest Processing and Drying Techniques on Physicochemical Properties of Thai Arabica Coffee. AgriEngineering, 6(3), 2198-2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6030129

Musebe, R., Agwanda, C., & Mekonen, M. (2007). Primary coffee processing in Ethiopia: Patterns, constraints and determinants. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, 8, 1417–1421. African Crop Science Society.

Nasanit, R, & Satayawut, K (2015). Microbiological Study During Coffee Fermentation of Coffea arabica var. chiangmai 80 in Thailand. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 49(1), 32–41. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/anres/article/view/243516

Peñuela Martínez, A. E., Sanz Uribe, J. R. & Medina Rivera, R. D. (2023). Influence of drying air temperature on coffee quality during storage. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 76(3), 10493–10503. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v76n3.104115

Ponte, S. (2019). Business, power and sustainability in a world of global value chains. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350218826

Reinato, C.H.R. & Borém, Flávio & Cirillo, Marcelo & Oliveira, E.C. (2012). Quality of the coffee dried on grounds with different surfaces and thickness layers. Coffee Science. 7. 223-237.

Samper, L. F., & Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F. (2017). Towards a Balanced Sustainability Vision for the Coffee Industry. Resources, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6020017

Seninde, D. R., & Chambers, E., IV. (2020). Coffee Flavor: A Review. Beverages, 6(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages6030044

Soeswanto, B., Wahyuni, N. L. E., & Prihandini, G. (2021). The development of coffee bean drying process technology: A review. Advances in Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.211106.026

Specialty Coffee Association. (2024). Coffee Value Assessment. https://sca.coffee/value-assessment

Strocchi, G. (2023). Omics approaches to study the chemistry behind the different aspects of coffee quality (Doctoral dissertation). https://tesidottorato.depositolegale.it/bitstream/20.500.14242/199091/1/Tesi%20PhD%20Strocchi.pdf

Suárez-Quiroz, M., González-Ríos, O., Barel, M., Guyot, B., Schorr-Galindo, S., & Guiraud, J.-P. (2005). Effect of the post-harvest processing procedure on OTA occurrence in artificially contaminated coffee. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 103(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.11.044

Sunarharum, W. B., Yuwono, S. S., & Nadhiroh, H. (2018). Effect Of Different Post-Harvest Processing on the Sensory Profile of Java Arabica Coffee. In W. B. Sunarharum, S. S. Yuwono, & H. Nadhiroh, Advances In Food Science Sustainable Agriculture and Agroindustrial Engineering (Vol. 1, Issue 1, P. 9). Brawijaya University. https://doi.Org/10.21776/Ub.Afssaae.2018.001.01.2

Tesfa, M. (2019). Effect of drying methods on raw quality of selected cultivars of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) grown in Southwest Ethiopia. Int. J. Sci. Res. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343106045

Tesgera, K. L., Nandeshwar, B. C., Jalata, Z., & Chala, T. (2021). Physical quality of coffee bean (Coffea arabica L.) as affected by harvesting and drying methods. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 16(2), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v16i2.1182

Tsegaye, B., Mohammed, A., Shimber, T., Getachew, Y., & Getachew, E. (2015). Impact of sun drying methods and layer thickness on the quality of highland Arabica coffee varieties at Limmu, Southwestern Ethiopia. Basic Research Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2(1), 12–20. Ethiopian Ministry of Agriculture; Jimma University; Jimma Agricultural Research Center; Wolkite University. https://doi.Org/10.4172/2376-0354.1000117

Tsegaye, B., Ibrahim, A. M., Shimber, T., Getachew, Y., & Seyum, E. (2014). The influence of sun drying methods and layer thickness on the quality of lowland Arabica coffee varieties at Gomma I, Southwestern Ethiopia. Research Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Management, 3, 547–554.

USDA. (2024). World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates for Coffee. United States Department of Agriculture.

Velásquez, S., Banchón, C., Chilán, W., & Guerrero-Casado, J. (2022). Effect Of Three Post-Harvest Methods At Different Altitudes on the Organoleptic Quality of C. Canephora Coffee. Beverages, 8(4), 83. https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Beverages8040083

Villase, M. P. (2023). The History of Philippine Coffee: A Tale of Resilience and Revival. Kape De Filipina. Https://Kapedefilipina.Eu/Blogs/Philippine-Coffee/The-History-Of-Philippine-Coffee-A-Tale-Of

Vossen, H., Bertrand, B., & Charrier, A. (2015). Next generation variety development for sustainable production of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.): A review. Euphytica, 204(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1398-z

Williams, S. D., deAndrade, D., & Liu, L. (2023). Coffee is more than flavor, the creation of a coffee character wheel. Journal of Sensory Studies, 38(6), e12886. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12886

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

Eladia, R., & Ortuoste, J. (2026). Sensory Quality Evaluation of Robusta Coffee Beans as Influenced by Drying Methods and Load Volume. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20120441

Similar Articles

71-80 of 96

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.