Digital Tools in Language Teaching at Marie Vithaya School Towards Faculty Development Program

Authors

  • Arlene M. Asis Philippine Christian University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20182688

Keywords:

digital tools, language teaching, DigCompEdu, faculty development, digital competence, educational technology

Abstract

This study examined the use of digital tools in language teaching at Marie Vithaya School as basis for a proposed faculty development program. Specifically, it described the profile of language teachers, identified the digital tools used in instruction, assessed the extent of digital tool use in terms of ease of use, professional engagement, digital resources, teaching and learning, assessment, empowering learners, and facilitating learners' digital competence, and tested differences in digital tool use when grouped according to selected profile variables. The study employed a descriptive-correlational quantitative design using an adopted DigCompEdu-based questionnaire administered through Google Forms to 58 Thai and foreign language teachers during the academic year 2022-2023. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, ranking, mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, and one-way analysis of variance. Findings showed that most respondents were female, foreign language teachers, between 31 and 40 years old, with less than a decade of teaching experience, and with a medium level of ability in handling digital tools. The most commonly used tools were laptops, multimedia projectors, presentation software, search engines, and online dictionaries and translation tools. Across all DigCompEdu domains, teachers reported a high extent of digital tool use, with ease of use receiving the highest group mean and facilitating learners' digital competence receiving the lowest but still high rating. Inferential results generally showed no significant differences in digital tool use according to age, nationality, ability to handle digital tools, and years of teaching experience, although professional engagement differed by gender. The study concludes that digital tools are already integrated into language teaching at Marie Vithaya School, but targeted faculty development remains necessary to strengthen teachers' competence in digital pedagogy, assessment, and learner digital competence.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alqahtani, A. (2019). The use of technology in English language teaching. Frontiers in Education Technology, 2(3), 168-180. https://doi.org/10.22158/fet.v2n3p168

Ammade, S., Mahmud, M., Jabu, B., & Tahmir, S. (2018). Integrating technology in English language teaching: Global experiences and lessons for Indonesia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(6), 107-114.

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers' adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136-155.

Celik, S., & Aytin, K. (2013). Digital literacies in the EFL classroom: Challenges faced by Turkish instructors of English as a foreign language. Teaching English with Technology, 14(4), 64-84.

Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64-80.

Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and learning with ICT tools: Issues and challenges from teachers' perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 38-57.

Gunuç, S., & Babacan, N. (2018). Technology integration in English language teaching and learning. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, E. Kakoulli Constantinou, & C. N. Giannikas (Eds.), Positioning English for specific purposes in an English language teaching context (pp. 1-15). University of Nicosia Press.

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285.

Hrastinski, S. (2021). Digital tools to support teacher professional development in lesson studies: A systematic literature review. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 10(2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2020-0062

Huong, L. P. H., & Hung, B. P. (2021). Mediation of digital tools in English learning. Information and Communication Technology in English Language Teaching, 14(4), 103-116.

Kurt, S., Kuzu, A., Dursun, O. O., Gullu, K., & Gulpinar, F. (2013). Evaluation of the pilot application process of FATIH project: Teachers' views. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 2(1), 1-23.

Lamb, M., & Arisandy, F. E. (2020). The impact of online use of English on motivation to learn. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 85-108.

Moorhouse, B. L., & Yan, L. (2023). Use of digital tools by English language schoolteachers. Education Sciences, 13(3), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030226

Nagel, I., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Afdal, H. W. (2023). Teacher educators' professional agency in facilitating professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104238.

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/178382

Shatri, Z. G. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of using information technology in the learning process of students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 420-428.

Srivastava, K., & Dey, S. (2018). Role of digital technology in teaching-learning process. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 23(1), 74-79.

Zengulaaru, J., & Nyamekye, E. (2022). Modern technologies in language teaching and learning. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2), 23-35.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-14

How to Cite

Asis, A. (2026). Digital Tools in Language Teaching at Marie Vithaya School Towards Faculty Development Program. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 649-657. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20182688

Similar Articles

31-40 of 251

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.