Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulations in Teaching Science and Test-Scores Among Students

Authors

  • Jadilyn Rose S. Yamit Camiguin Polytechnic State College; Mahinog National High School Author
  • Elizabeth H. Remigoso Camiguin Polytechnic State College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20572436

Keywords:

Grade 8 Science, interactive simulations, PhET, quasi-experimental research, science education, test scores

Abstract

This study examined the use of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulations in teaching Science and the test scores of Grade 8 students at Mahinog National High School during School Year 2025-2026. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was used with two intact heterogeneous classes: 37 learners in the control group and 37 learners in the experimental group. The control group received lecture-based instruction supported by the chalkboard, whereas the experimental group received instruction using PhET Interactive Simulations aligned with Grade 8 Science lessons. A validated curriculum-aligned test with a reported Cronbach's alpha of .83 was administered before and after the 18-day intervention. Frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, independent-samples t-test, and multiple regression analysis were used. The control group's mean increased from 6.57 (SD = 3.50) to 8.02 (SD = 4.30), while the experimental group's mean increased from 10.54 (SD = 4.60) to 13.51 (SD = 5.40). The experimental group demonstrated a larger gain score (2.97) than the control group (1.45), with the source manuscript reporting a significant gain-score difference, t = 2.69, p = .008. The regression model was significant, F(8, 65) = 39.62, p < .001, and explained 83% of the variance in posttest scores. Baseline score and instructional group were significant predictors, while age, family income, household size, and their reported interaction terms were not significant. The findings indicate that PhET simulations can serve as a useful supplement to Science instruction. Because the intact groups differed substantially at baseline, the intervention effect should be interpreted using the adjusted regression results and verified against the original statistical output before publication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2022). The impact of PhET interactive simulation-based learning on academic achievement and motivation among physics students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3

Dy, A. U., Lagura, J. C., & Baluyos, G. R. (2024). Using PhET interactive simulations to improve learners' performance in science. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 4(4), 520-530. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline2981

Fuentes, J. H. W., Escalante, K. A., Manimog, A. J. C., & Garcia, M. P. (2025). Improving Grade 7 students' understanding of the phases of matter through PhET interactive simulations. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(8), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i82216

Mallari, R., & Lumanog, G. D. (2020). The effectiveness of integrating PhET interactive simulation-based activities in improving students' academic performance in science. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.31708

Perkins, K. K., Adams, W. K., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., Reid, S., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 44(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2150754

Quimoyog, J. K. O., Torres, G. D., & Galay-Limos, J. A. (2025). The effect of Physics Education Technology (PhET) interactive simulations on improving science achievement. International Journal of Research Studies in Management, 13(8), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsm.2025.25526

Taibu, R., Mataka, L., & Shekoyan, V. (2021). Using PhET simulations to improve scientific skills and attitudes of community college students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(3), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1214

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Uwambajimana, S., Minani, E., Mollel, A. D., & Nyirahabimana, P. (2023). The impact of using PhET simulation on conceptual understanding of electrostatics within selected secondary schools of Muhanga District, Rwanda. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2), Article em045. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13595

Downloads

Published

2026-06-06

How to Cite

Yamit, J. R., & Remigoso, E. (2026). Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulations in Teaching Science and Test-Scores Among Students. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 555-560. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20572436

Similar Articles

31-40 of 423

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.