The Teaching Pedagogies as Correlates to the Board Licensure Examination for Professional Teachers (BLEPT) Performance of Selected Teacher Education Institutions (TEIs): Inputs for Faculty and Curriculum Instruction Areas

Authors

  • Bernadette B. Gomez Taguig City University Author
  • Jenifer E. Tolang Taguig City University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20758550

Keywords:

Teaching Pedagogies, BLEPT Performance, Teacher Education Institutions (TEIs), Faculty and Curriculum Areas, Accreditation Compliance

Abstract

One of the most pressing concerns nowadays is the quality of education. Because the major focus of education has shifted, educators should go beyond present educational demands to maintain the standard of 21st-century pedagogy. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the teaching pedagogies as correlates with BLEPT performance as assessed by the sixty-six (66) faculty members of the selected TEIs. This study made use of the descriptive research method and stratified sampling technique. The findings of the study revealed that the faculty members of the selected TEIs integrate 21st century pedagogical skills into their teaching.  However, there are four indicators under local and global connections that show that teachers frequently practice their skills in accordance with the principles of 21st century teaching. Accordingly, it has been found that those skills need to be enhanced in their teaching pedagogy. In terms of the relationship between the respondents’ assessment of 21st century teaching skills and their licensure examination rating, in the year 2018, it indicates that there is no association between the 21st century skills of teachers and the BLEPT rating. However, in 2019, half of the given eight components, such as critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and using technology as a learning tool, do not significantly affect the BLEPT performance of selected TEIs. Lastly, the null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference in 21st century pedagogical skills when they are grouped according to highest educational attainment, length of service, academic rank, and eligibility, except when grouped according to institution, which was revealed as statistically significant. As a result of the study's findings, inputs for faculty and curriculum instruction areas were proposed to aid accreditation compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almusharraf, N. (2021). Digital literacy and teaching in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Implications for higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09981-1

Bezanilla, M., Arranz, R., & Delgado, P. (2021). Collaborative learning and social interaction in higher education. Journal of Learning and Development, 12(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1923456

Borg, R., & Sanchez, L. (2021). Integrating local context in higher education curriculum: Enhancing student engagement. International Journal of Education Research, 105, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101715

Breed, M. (2020). The role of collaborative learning environments in student engagement. Journal of Higher Education Studies, 10(4), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.5539/jhes.v10n4p33

Cojocariu, V., Lazar, I., & Iancu, R. (2021). Inquiry-based learning and critical thinking development in digital environments. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1557–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10401-4

Chen, C., & Tsai, C. (2022). Fostering creativity and resilience through project-based learning in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101115

Frías, D., Serrano, J., & Campos, A. (2021). Digital communication ethics in higher education: Preparing responsible communicators. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.24059/jolt.v17i2.2321

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2020). Teaching and learning with 21st-century skills: A review of research. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1341a

Goodwin, K. (2020). Integrating ICT for student-centered learning: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Digital Learning, 7(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/20487734.2020.1736254

Kim, J., & Park, S. (2022). Data-driven communication and visual literacy in higher education. Computers & Education, 183, 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104542

Lopez, J., & Santos, R. (2021). Teachers’ professional experience and 21st-century skill development. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(5), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487121998831

López, M., & Valdez, A. (2021). Project-based learning for fostering creativity and innovation in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100904

Marquez, P., & Santos, G. (2022). Peer feedback and reflective thinking in collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1220–1235. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000689

Nguyen, H., & Pham, T. (2022). Professional experience and implementation of 21st-century teaching skills in higher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 50(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.2019876

Rahman, M., Islam, M., & Hossain, A. (2020). Modernizing curriculum and assessment for 21st-century competencies. International Journal of Education Development, 74, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102114

Reyes, M., & Datu, J. (2020). Multimodal literacy and digital learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 159, 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009

Rakhman, A., & Susilo, H. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching and local context integration in higher education. Journal of Educational Research, 115(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1909310

Sikhakhane, H., Govender, D., & Maphalala, M. (2020). ICT integration in student-centered learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4495–4512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10164-3

Sulaiman, J., & Ismail, S. N. (2020). Teacher competence and 21st-century skills in student-centered teaching. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3536–3544. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080829

Torres, R., & Ching, G. (2020). Structured group work and collaborative problem-solving in higher education. Journal of Educational Innovation, 15(3), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1785691

Yaccob, H., Yunus, M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Global competence development in higher education: Challenges and strategies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 42(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.2029901

Yazon, R., & Manaig, M. (2017). Professional qualifications and teaching effectiveness in higher education. Philippine Journal of Education, 96(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00318617.2017.1208352

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Gomez, B., & Tolang, J. (2026). The Teaching Pedagogies as Correlates to the Board Licensure Examination for Professional Teachers (BLEPT) Performance of Selected Teacher Education Institutions (TEIs): Inputs for Faculty and Curriculum Instruction Areas. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1210-1229. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20758550

Similar Articles

1-10 of 413

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.