Development of the P.A.R.E.N.T. Framework: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Sustainable Parent-Led School Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21784366Keywords:
Parent–Teacher Association, parent leadership, program evaluation, community engagement, school partnerships, framework development, mixed methodsAbstract
Parent–Teacher Associations (PTAs) have evolved beyond their traditional fundraising and advisory roles to become active partners in fostering school-community engagement through diverse educational, social, environmental, and outreach initiatives. Despite the growing significance of parent-led programs, limited research has examined how successful PTA initiatives can inform the development of a sustainable framework for school-community partnerships. This study aims to develop the P.A.R.E.N.T. Framework for Sustainable Parent-Led School Programs through a mixed-methods evaluation of PTA initiatives implemented in a private basic education institution in the Philippines. A convergent mixed-methods program evaluation design will be employed using secondary analysis of archived evaluation reports, participant surveys, accomplishment reports, financial reports, and program documentation. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses and documentary evidence will undergo thematic analysis. Findings from both strands will be integrated through triangulation to identify recurring characteristics of effective parent-led initiatives. The study is expected to identify the critical dimensions that contribute to sustainable PTA-led programs and to propose the P.A.R.E.N.T. Framework as an evidence-based model for strengthening parent leadership, stakeholder engagement, program implementation, transparency, and long-term sustainability in school communities.
Downloads
References
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Epstein, J. L. (2019). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Principles-focused evaluation: The GUIDE. Guilford Press.
Sanders, M. G. (2009). Collaborating for change: How an urban school district and a community-based organization support and sustain school, family, and community partnerships. Teachers College Press.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist. Western Michigan University.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.