A Digital Transformation Initiative for the Jolo Land Transportation Office

Authors

  • Nuri D. Hamidin Sulu State University, Sulu, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23642031

Keywords:

digital transformation, Land Transportation Office, licensing services, e-government, service accessibility, digital governance

Abstract

This study examined the challenges, perceived advantages, and implementation requirements of digital transformation in licensing procedures at the Jolo Land Transportation Office (LTO), Sulu, Philippines. Anchored in the Technology Acceptance Model, Diffusion of Innovations theory, and socio-technical perspectives, it used a descriptive mixed-methods design combining stakeholder questionnaires, key-informant interviews, and document review. Participants included licensing applicants, LTO personnel, and community stakeholders; the source manuscript did not state a definitive total number of respondents. Descriptive statistics (weighted means and standard deviations) and qualitative coding were used to organize the evidence. Respondents rated document verification and data-accessibility challenges as very challenging (M = 3.58), alongside workforce and infrastructure constraints (M = 3.63) and data-security and ethical issues (M = 3.67). They agreed with anticipated digitalization benefits for document verification (M = 4.07), workforce development (M = 4.17), and infrastructure resilience and ethical governance (M = 4.27). Ratings were similarly favorable for proposed functionality (M = 4.05), operational readiness (M = 4.11), and infrastructure safeguards (M = 4.05). Interview coding identified process delays, system transition, service improvement, and continuous system enhancement as interconnected priorities. These findings support a phased, security-conscious, and inclusive licensing modernization model combining digital record management, staff capacity building, reliable infrastructure, and accessible service channels. Because reported benefits were predominantly prospective or perception-based, the findings do not establish actual reductions in processing times or improvements in applicant satisfaction after implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, S., & Hamid, A. (2019). Digital government services: Enhancing transparency and efficiency in public administration. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 11(3), 45–56.

Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dela Cruz, R. T., & Bautista, L. M. (2019). Computerized transaction systems and organizational efficiency in provincial government offices. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 63(2), 85–102.

Garcia, M. E. (2018). Online service platforms and public service accessibility in local transport offices. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 40(4), 302–316.

Heeks, R. (2017). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge.

Kumar, R., & Singh, P. (2018). Challenges and opportunities in implementing digital transformation in government agencies. International Journal of E-Government Research, 14(2), 23–37.

Mendoza, J. P., & Flores, A. R. (2020). Digital readiness and technology adoption in Mindanao-based public institutions. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3(1), 55–68.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Digital government index: 2019 results (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 3). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en

Reyes, M. T. (2020). Digital transformation in semi-urban government offices: A case study on service modernization. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 12–28.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Santos, J., Lopez, R., & Cruz, V. (2021). Evaluating digital government initiatives in remote and semi-urban areas: Lessons from the Philippines. Journal of E-Governance and Technology, 7(2), 89–105.

Torres, A. L. (2021). User satisfaction and trust in e-government services in southern Philippine municipalities. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 14(3), 421–437.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2020). United Nations e-government survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. United Nations.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428

Villanueva, C. P., & Ramos, E. J. (2019). Transparency and accountability mechanisms in Philippine public agencies through digital systems. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 19(2), 65–80.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-25

How to Cite

Hamidin, N. (2026). A Digital Transformation Initiative for the Jolo Land Transportation Office. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(10), 2100-2107. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23642031

Similar Articles

1-10 of 529

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.