Instructors and University Professors' Perception on Knowledge Management in School Environment

Authors

  • Isagani M. Tano, PhD-ELM, DIT Quezon City University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18146541

Keywords:

knowledge management, higher education, teacher perception, knowledge sharing, organizational culture

Abstract

An alternative strategy that can be used by schools and universities in keeping their instructors and professors equipped with relevant skills to face challenges in improving performance as its uses in commercial sectors is Knowledge Management. However, little research has been undertaken on how knowledge management can be applied to school environment. To put knowledge management into action, it is crucial to understand teachers’ perception of knowledge management at the outset. The study was carried out in a Quezon City University. Interviews, based on relevant knowledge management models, were conducted to understand the instructors and professors’ perception of knowledge management. The result of the study found that knowledge sharing, people, culture and knowledge storage with IT support were regarded as important from the interviewees’ points of view. Most interviewees might accept that knowledge management can help improve their practice but it needs the support of various dimensions such as people, culture, IT and management. The findings may provide insights for knowledge management implementation in the school.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barron, T. (2000). A smarter Frankenstein: The merging of e-learning and knowledge management. Learning Circuits. Alexandria, VA: ASTD. Retrieved August 8, 2007, from http://www.leamingcircuits.org/aug200/barron.html.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Teacher learning in professional communities: Three knowledge -practice relationships. In P. D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Reviews of research in education (pp. 251–307). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Petrides, L. A., & Nodine, T. R. (2003). Knowledge management in education : Defining the Landscape. (Report). Half Moon Bay, CA.: Institute for the study of Knowledge Management in Education.

Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.

Reynolds, N., Diamantopoulos, A., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (1993). Pretesting in questionnaire design: A review of the literature and suggestions for further research. Journal of the Market Research Society, 35, 171–182.

Rodrigues, L. L. R., & Pai, R. (2005). Preparation and validation of KM measurement instrument : an empirical study in educational and IT sectors. In S. Al-Hawamdeh & M. International Conference on Knowledge (Eds.), Knowledge management : nurturing culture, innovation and technology : proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Knowledge Management, North Carolina, USA, 27–28 October 2005 (pp. 582–593). Singapore ; Hackensack, N.J.: World Scientific.

Zhao, J. (2010). School knowledge management framework and strategies: The new perspective on teacher professional development. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 168–175

Downloads

Published

2026-01-04

How to Cite

Tano, I. (2026). Instructors and University Professors’ Perception on Knowledge Management in School Environment. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18146541

Similar Articles

1-10 of 106

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.