iSkulFlow: An Event-Driven Queueing and Transactional Management System for Registrar and Financial Services

Authors

  • Jobanie F. Panganiban VMC Asian College Foundation, Inc. Author
  • Angielo B. Becenia Notre Dame of Marbel University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19034509

Keywords:

appointment management system; document request system; queue monitoring; email notification; web-based system

Abstract

 

Scheduling of appointments, document requests, payments recording and monitoring queues remain a challenge in educational institutions as they still use manual and fragmented systems. VMC Asian College Foundation, Inc. has a slow processing of academic documents, physical queue and weak transparency of monitoring which can be the cause of inefficiencies and dissatisfaction of the services. This project has come up with iSkulFlow, a smart academic appointment and document request, which is an integration of email notification and web-based administration panel. The purpose of the study was to automate the appointment booking, accelerate the process of document requesting, improve queue management, and administrative monitoring. A descriptive-developmental design of a study was adopted. The development of the system was based on the agile methodology and it was evaluated according to the System Usability Scale (SUS) among the administrators, registrar staff, cashier staff, and students. The findings have shown that the system has obtained an overall acceptable usability rating and has performed really well in terms of functionality, usability, reliability and efficiency. Results show that iSkulFlow is very effective in increasing the speed of transaction, the level of physical congestion, the level of monitoring transparency, and manually reducing errors in managing academic services. The researchers come to the conclusion that the introduction of an online appointment and document management system allows increasing the efficiency of institutions operations and service provision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, I. L. McClelland, & B. Weerdmeester (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22.

Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment: An international text. Sage Publications.

Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16th ed.). Pearson.

Lewis, J. R. (2018). The System Usability Scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human– Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590.

Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Panganiban, J., & Becenia, A. (2026). iSkulFlow: An Event-Driven Queueing and Transactional Management System for Registrar and Financial Services. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(3), 847-853. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19034509

Similar Articles

1-10 of 82

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.