Investigative Leadership and Operational Accountability in National Bureau of Investigation Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20643201Keywords:
case direction, investigative leadership, NBI services, operational accountability, supervisory guidanceAbstract
This study investigated the relationship between investigative leadership and operational accountability in National Bureau of Investigation services, with attention to how leadership practices shaped responsible, timely, and procedurally grounded service delivery. Using a predictive explanatory quantitative design, the study gathered data through a validated and reliability-tested survey questionnaire that measured investigative leadership in terms of strategic case direction, ethical decision-making, supervisory guidance, personnel coordination, and crisis-responsive leadership. Operational accountability was assessed through procedural transparency, documentation discipline, timeliness of action, evidence and records responsibility, client responsiveness, and corrective service mechanisms. The findings showed that investigative leadership was rated very high, with ethical decision-making, strategic case direction, and supervisory guidance emerging as the strongest areas. Operational accountability was rated high, although lower results were noted in corrective service mechanisms, timeliness of action, and documentation discipline. Spearman’s rho revealed a strong positive and significant relationship between investigative leadership and operational accountability. Ordinal logistic regression further showed that supervisory guidance, strategic case direction, ethical decision-making, and personnel coordination significantly predicted higher accountability outcomes, while dominance analysis identified supervisory guidance as the strongest contributor. The study concluded that accountable investigative service was strengthened when leadership was visible, ethical, directive, and closely connected to daily operational work. It recommended stronger supervisory monitoring, improved case tracking, standardized documentation review, and clearer corrective service procedures to further reinforce accountability in NBI operations.
Downloads
References
Archbold, C. A. (2021). Police accountability in the USA: Gaining traction or spinning wheels? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(3), 1665–1683. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paab033
Chan, A., Bradford, B., & Stott, C. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of procedural justice and legitimacy in policing: The effect of social identity and social contexts. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 21, 349–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09595-5
Ericsson, S., Öman Ekervhén, L., Nyström, M., Stenlund, T., & Davis, P. (2024). “There is no script”: Police teachers’ experiences of training investigative interviewing. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 39, 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-024-09692-9
Kassin, S. M., Cleary, H. M. D., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., & Scherr, K. C. (2025). Police-induced confessions, 2.0: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000593
Lillis, D., Becker, B. A., O’Sullivan, T., & Scanlon, M. (2016). Current challenges and future research areas for digital forensic investigation. In Proceedings of the 11th ADFSL Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law (pp. 9–20). Association of Digital Forensics, Security and Law. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1604.03850
Mansoor, M. (2021). Citizens’ trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency’s provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), Article 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101597
Mount, D., & Mazerolle, L. (2021). Investigative interviewing skills in policing: Examining the transfer of training into workplace practices. Policing: An International Journal, 44(3), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-12-2019-0182
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Policing to promote the rule of law and protect the population: An evidence-based approach. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26217
Pérez-Durán, I. (2024). Twenty-five years of accountability research in public administration: Authorship, themes, methods, and future trends. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(3), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231211751
Republic Act No. 10867. (2016). National Bureau of Investigation Reorganization and Modernization Act. Republic of the Philippines.
Schnell, S., Mihes, D., Sobjak, A., & van Acker, W. (2021). Performance management in the public administration: Seven success factors. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/35921
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2011). Handbook on police accountability, oversight and integrity. United Nations.
Yesberg, J. A., Sargeant, E., Fenn, L., Murphy, K., & Madon, N. (2024). Fairness in policing: How does internal procedural justice translate to external procedural justice? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18, Article paae126. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae126
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
